VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Suzuki Across comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 49,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Suzuki Across?

Skoda Enyaq vs Suzuki Across: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Suzuki Across

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Enyaq is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Suzuki Across costs 49,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,029 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 514 km more than the Suzuki Across.

Across

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Suzuki Across takes 6 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is marginally lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,075 kg. The difference is around 1 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more boot space – 585 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries somewhat more – 526 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Skoda Enyaq
Suzuki Across

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Across

The Suzuki Across is Suzuki's take on a roomy, efficient plug-in SUV handed down from its Toyota cousin, marrying sensible practicality with a polished, grown-up driving character. It won't thrill those chasing sporty drama, but for buyers who value measured refinement, low running costs and lots of usable space, it's an unexpectedly accomplished and subtly premium package.

details
Across_überarbeitet_1
Across_überarbeitet_4

Reviews Suzuki Across

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Suzuki Across
Toyota RAV4
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Across and the Toyota RAV4 comes down to whether you prioritise an efficient plug‑in hybrid or a more conventional, broader compact SUV package. The Across is Suzuki’s take on the RAV4 PHEV with strong electric range and fuel economy, while the RAV4 offers a wider model …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Suzuki Across
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki Across and the Toyota Corolla Cross (commonly called the Corolla Cross) are compact crossover SUVs that blend hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly packaging. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior space, equipment and running costs to help you pick the one that suits your …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
Skoda Enyaq
Suzuki Across

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
49,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
22 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
490 L
Length
-
Length
4,635 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,690 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,604 L
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.