VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo XC60?

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo XC60: A Clash of Scandinavian Titans

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo XC60 stand tall as significant contenders for those desiring a blend of innovation, efficiency, and performance. Both of these models bring a distinct touch of Scandinavian design and engineering to the forefront. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that make the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo XC60 unique picks in the SUV arena.

XC60

Electric Prowess vs. Hybrid Versatility

The Skoda Enyaq is a proud bearer of the electric title, offering a purely electric driveline with different power outputs ranging from 204 to 340 HP. It provides an impressive electric range stretching up to 587 km, backed by a substantial battery capacity of 77 kWh. This heralds an era of zero emissions, with the Enyaq achieving a CO2 output of 0 g/km.

On the flip side, the Volvo XC60 offers a hybrid approach. With engine options like the petrol MHEV and the Plugin Hybrid, the XC60 caters to a more versatile fuel requirement, maintaining efficiency with a combined consumption as low as 0.9 L/100km for its plug-in hybrid model. While offering up to 455 HP, the XC60 also gives drivers a whispered ride with an electric range of up to 80 km.

Enyaq

Performance and Technical Brilliance

When it comes to performance, both the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo XC60 demonstrate capabilities that exhilarate. The Enyaq accelerates from 0-100 km/h in impressive times as quick as 5.5 seconds, offering maximum torque up to 679 Nm. Notably, it achieves a top speed of 180 km/h.

Meanwhile, the XC60 races with a similar top speed but accelerates a bit quicker, with the faster version reaching 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, driven by a torque as high as 709 Nm. This model's robust power comes from a sophisticated four-cylinder engine, indicating a melding of power and engineering prowess that Volvo is known for.

XC60

Space and Comfort

For those who prioritize space and comfort, both SUVs cater well to that need. The Skoda Enyaq offers a spacious trunk capacity of up to 585 liters, rendering it practical for family adventures and getaways. With a curb weight starting from 2002 kg, it delivers ample stability on the road.

The XC60, slightly more compact in trunk size, offers up to 483 liters but maintains a robust and luxurious interior complemented by its payload capability of up to 550 kg. With accommodating seating for five and detailed attention to luxury, the XC60 ensures a premium feel.

Enyaq

Conclusion: Choosing Your Scandinavian Steed

The choice between the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo XC60 largely depends on personal preference regarding fuel type and driving experience. If an electrically committed lifestyle with an eye towards sustainability wins your heart, the Skoda Enyaq promises much. Contrarily, the refined hybrid methodology of the Volvo XC60 may attract those willing to keep a foot in both worlds—petrol and electric—whilst not compromising on power.

Ultimately, both SUVs encapsulate the spirit of modern engagement with technology, wrapped in a sophisticated design, ready to tackle the roads with Scandinavian flair.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,429 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 510 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers moderately more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 66 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers very slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is marginally lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 76 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries marginally more – 526 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
details
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.