Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo XC60 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo XC60?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11134 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs clearly better – achieving up to 587 km, about 505 km more than the Volvo XC60.
XC60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a noticeable edge – offering 455 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls barely noticeable stronger with 709 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 102 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more room – 585 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs minimal better – up to 1710 L, which is about 167 L more than the Volvo XC60.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 hardly perceptible takes the win – 550 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Volvo XC60
5 (2 Reviews)
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.