VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo XC60?

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • somewhat more trunk space

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo XC60: A Clash of Scandinavian Titans

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo XC60 stand tall as significant contenders for those desiring a blend of innovation, efficiency, and performance. Both of these models bring a distinct touch of Scandinavian design and engineering to the forefront. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that make the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo XC60 unique picks in the SUV arena.

XC60

Electric Prowess vs. Hybrid Versatility

The Skoda Enyaq is a proud bearer of the electric title, offering a purely electric driveline with different power outputs ranging from 204 to 340 HP. It provides an impressive electric range stretching up to 587 km, backed by a substantial battery capacity of 77 kWh. This heralds an era of zero emissions, with the Enyaq achieving a CO2 output of 0 g/km.

On the flip side, the Volvo XC60 offers a hybrid approach. With engine options like the petrol MHEV and the Plugin Hybrid, the XC60 caters to a more versatile fuel requirement, maintaining efficiency with a combined consumption as low as 0.9 L/100km for its plug-in hybrid model. While offering up to 455 HP, the XC60 also gives drivers a whispered ride with an electric range of up to 80 km.

Enyaq

Performance and Technical Brilliance

When it comes to performance, both the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo XC60 demonstrate capabilities that exhilarate. The Enyaq accelerates from 0-100 km/h in impressive times as quick as 5.5 seconds, offering maximum torque up to 679 Nm. Notably, it achieves a top speed of 180 km/h.

Meanwhile, the XC60 races with a similar top speed but accelerates a bit quicker, with the faster version reaching 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, driven by a torque as high as 709 Nm. This model's robust power comes from a sophisticated four-cylinder engine, indicating a melding of power and engineering prowess that Volvo is known for.

XC60

Space and Comfort

For those who prioritize space and comfort, both SUVs cater well to that need. The Skoda Enyaq offers a spacious trunk capacity of up to 585 liters, rendering it practical for family adventures and getaways. With a curb weight starting from 2002 kg, it delivers ample stability on the road.

The XC60, slightly more compact in trunk size, offers up to 483 liters but maintains a robust and luxurious interior complemented by its payload capability of up to 550 kg. With accommodating seating for five and detailed attention to luxury, the XC60 ensures a premium feel.

Enyaq

Conclusion: Choosing Your Scandinavian Steed

The choice between the Skoda Enyaq and Volvo XC60 largely depends on personal preference regarding fuel type and driving experience. If an electrically committed lifestyle with an eye towards sustainability wins your heart, the Skoda Enyaq promises much. Contrarily, the refined hybrid methodology of the Volvo XC60 may attract those willing to keep a foot in both worlds—petrol and electric—whilst not compromising on power.

Ultimately, both SUVs encapsulate the spirit of modern engagement with technology, wrapped in a sophisticated design, ready to tackle the roads with Scandinavian flair.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,277 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 505 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers very slightly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC60 is a bit lighter – 1,900 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more boot space – 585 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries somewhat more – 550 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
-
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.