Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng P7+ comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 503 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 39,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng P7+?
Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng P7+: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Enyaq is only slightly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the XPeng P7+ costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,094 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.2 kWh/100km for the XPeng P7+. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 59 km more than the XPeng P7+.
P7+
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7+ offers markedly more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7+ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, XPeng P7+ is only slightly lighter – 1,999 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 573 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 526 kg compared to 486 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The XPeng P7+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,900
XPeng P7+
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7+
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
XPeng P7+
The XPeng P7+ is a sleek, coupe-like electric sedan that pairs a spacious, tech-forward cabin with an easygoing yet poised driving character — think premium feel without premium smugness. Packed with clever driver aids and a refined ride that earns the odd grin on twisty roads, it’s a compelling, modern alternative to the usual premium suspects.
details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7+
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
Price
39,900 - 45,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
Electric Range
455 - 530 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
Curb weight
1,999 - 2,200 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
573 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,937 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Payload
485 - 486 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
245 - 503 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
180 - 370 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
XPeng
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.