VS

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng P7+ comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 503 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 39,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng P7+?

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng P7+: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • marginally more trunk space
details

XPeng P7+

  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

XPeng P7+ is only slightly cheaper – starting at 39,900 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,972 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 15.2 kWh/100km for the XPeng P7+. That’s a difference of about 0.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 57 km more than the XPeng P7+.

P7+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7+ offers markedly more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7+ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, XPeng P7+ is only slightly lighter – 1,999 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 573 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng P7+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,900
P7+

XPeng P7+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 245 - 503 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.2 - 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 455 - 530 km
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7+

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details

XPeng P7+

The XPeng P7+ is a sleek, coupe-like electric sedan that pairs a spacious, tech-forward cabin with an easygoing yet poised driving character — think premium feel without premium smugness. Packed with clever driver aids and a refined ride that earns the odd grin on twisty roads, it’s a compelling, modern alternative to the usual premium suspects.

details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7+

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
39,900 - 45,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
455 - 530 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
1,999 - 2,200 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
573 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,937 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
245 - 503 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
450 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
180 - 370 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
XPeng
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.