VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Jeep Compass comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Jeep Compass?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Jeep Compass: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space

Jeep Compass

2.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • very slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Jeep Compass is somewhat cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,677 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers considerably more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 378 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Compass

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers moderately more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is slightly faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 38 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers a bit more torque with 400 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is very slightly lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 17 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more boot space – 910 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 360 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 544 L more than the Jeep Compass.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
Jeep Compass

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Jeep Compass

The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.

details
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012

Reviews Jeep Compass

2.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Skoda Kodiaq offer compelling options for families seeking versatility and comfort. The Hyundai Santa Fe impresses with its bold styling, advanced safety features, and an array of technology options, making it a strong contender for …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Skoda Kodiaq
Jeep Compass

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
0 - 130 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
550 L
Length
4,758 mm
Length
4,552 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Height
1,675 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
226 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Jeep
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.