Compare performance (265 HP vs 200 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 29,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Renault Austral?
SUV enthusiasts are often faced with the challenge of choosing between practicality, performance, and innovation when selecting their new vehicle. Today, we examine two standout contenders in this category: the Renault Austral and the Skoda Kodiaq. Both models deliver on several fronts, but which one truly stands out? Let's delve into the details.
The Renault Austral offers two engine choices, primarily focusing on efficient and contemporary petrol MHEV and full hybrid setups. You can expect 158 HP and 200 HP outputs, complemented by a torque of 270 Nm. The Austral delivers a top speed of 174 km/h and accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 8.4 to 9.7 seconds. Fuel consumption is an impressive 4.7 to 6.1 L/100km, which speaks to its economic edge.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq provides a wider range of engine options, from Plugin Hybrid to Petrol MHEV, Diesel, and Petrol variants, with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to an exhilarating 265 HP. Torque spans from 250 to 400 Nm, and its 0-100 km/h acceleration can be as quick as 6.3 seconds, showing a clear emphasis on power and speed. Fuel consumption varies widely but can reach as little as 0.4 L/100km in the Plugin Hybrid configuration, with an electric range of up to 123 km.
The Austral measures 4510 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1618 mm in height, translating into a compact yet versatile SUV profile. It offers a trunk capacity of 500 liters and can comfortably seat five, making it a suitable option for families or those needing adequate passenger and cargo space.
In contrast, the Kodiaq's dimensions are more robust, at an extended length of up to 4761 mm, 1864 mm in width, and a height in the range of 1663 to 1683 mm. Its generous trunk capacity of up to 910 liters highlights its champion status in cargo space, providing ample room for both passengers and their luggage.
Both SUVs embrace modern technology, but with varied approaches. The Austral, with a hedge on its hybrid configuration, leans into energy efficiency and lower emissions, classifying as CO2 efficiency classes E and C. It also incorporates an easy-to-navigate automatic CVT system, ensuring a smooth and effortless driving experience.
The Kodiaq impresses with its dual-clutch automatic transmission, delivering smoother transitions and better efficiency, particularly in diverse driving conditions. Its Plugin Hybrid version boasts a class-leading CO2 efficiency class B, with minimal emissions of 9 to 11 g/km, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious drivers.
Deciding between the Renault Austral and Skoda Kodiaq ultimately depends on individual priorities. The Austral offers incredible fuel efficiency and a modern hybrid setup in a compact form, ideal for urban settings and eco-focused drivers.
Conversely, the Kodiaq stands out for its impressive power delivery, expansive cargo space, and emissions-friendly Plugin Hybrid option, suiting those who value versatility and speed. Both SUVs are exemplary in their niches, providing excellent options for prospective buyers in the market for a refined yet robust driving experience.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Austral is noticeably cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,963 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Austral with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.4 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is markedly faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Renault Austral tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is very slightly lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 383 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers moderately more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 369 L more than the Renault Austral.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries moderately more – 563 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
109 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
4,533 mm
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,645 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
455 - 477 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España