Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Suzuki S-Cross - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 21800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Suzuki S-Cross?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki S-Cross has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15086 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.30 L. The difference is about 3.80 L per 100 km.
S-Cross
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a decisively edge – offering 265 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 155 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls convincingly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 165 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is noticeable lighter – 1280 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 480 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs decisively better – up to 2105 L, which is about 875 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq evident takes the win – 563 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 158 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Suzuki S-Cross
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Suzuki S-Cross
4.7 (3 Reviews)
The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Suzuki S-Cross
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
21800 - 34200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1280 - 1385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4305 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1785 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.