Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota C-HR - Differences and prices compared
Kodiaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota C-HR has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 7714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Toyota C-HR with 0.80 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly better – achieving up to 123 km, about 55 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a a bit edge – offering 265 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
Kodiaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Toyota C-HR is a bit lighter – 1505 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 179 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 463 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs decisively better – up to 2105 L, which is about 950 L more than the Toyota C-HR.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq noticeable takes the win – 563 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £36,800
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota C-HR
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (1 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Toyota C-HR
5 (1 Reviews)
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota C-HR
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
co2
17 - 115 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4362 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1832 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.