VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Toyota C-HR?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space

Toyota C-HR

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • somewhat lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR is noticeably cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Toyota C-HR with 2.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 56 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers slightly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is somewhat lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 179 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 463 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries noticeably more – 563 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C‑HR is the flamboyant, coupe‑like crossover that trades rear-seat space for eye-catching design and a higher stance, while the Toyota Corolla is the dependable compact that serves up better packaging, comfort and efficient powertrains. If you want personality and city swagger, pick the …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like the posh roommate you suddenly inherited — plush cabin, hushed hybrid powertrain and a dashboard that whispers premium — while the Toyota C‑HR plays the affordable style rebel with quirky looks and surprisingly practical packaging. Choose the LBX for serene luxury and badge …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Toyota C-HR and Toyota Yaris showcase their distinct personalities in the subcompact segment. While the C-HR offers a bold design and a more spacious interior, the Yaris stands out with its nimbleness and fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their distinctive designs and hybrid options. While the Lexus UX offers a more premium interior and advanced technology features, the Toyota C-HR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its sporty styling and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
4,758 mm
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
226 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.