VS

SsangYong Rexton vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Toyota C-HR+?

SsangYong Rexton vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Toyota C-HR+ is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,143 £.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers clearly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 141 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 5.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Rexton delivers visibly more torque with 441 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 103 Nm more.

Rexton

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is a bit lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers significantly more boot space – 784 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 368 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries somewhat more – 770 kg compared to 655 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to whether you prioritise compact practicality and efficiency or a bolder, more stylised driving experience. I’ll compare their space, ride, economy, tech and ownership costs so you can see which one fits your daily needs and …
SsangYong Rexton
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Frank Williams CPA/ ACCA/ CPD
22 Jan 2026, 01:20:01

Ssang Yong Rexton is better than the Land Cruiser

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Krzysztof
17 Jun 2026, 07:19:28

More comfortable
Visually bigger and nicer
Low energy consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
BMW iX1
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The BMW iX1 and the Toyota C‑HR+ represent two very different takes on the compact crossover: the iX1 delivers BMW’s premium electric driving experience, refinement and latest tech, while the C‑HR+ emphasizes bold styling, hybrid efficiency and everyday practicality. Choose the iX1 if you …
VW ID.3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison pits the Volkswagen ID.3 — a compact, all-electric hatch — against the Toyota C-HR+ — a stylish compact crossover often offered with hybrid powertrains — to help you decide between pure-electric driving and crossover practicality. If you want low running costs, instant torque and a …
Tesla Model 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Tesla Model 3 and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to whether you prefer an efficient, high-tech electric sedan or a compact, style-focused crossover. The Model 3 stands out for electric range, sharp performance and advanced driver-assist features, while the Toyota C‑HR (commonly …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Volvo EX40
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison pits the Volvo EX40 against the Toyota C-HR to help you decide whether a compact premium electric SUV or a stylish, efficient compact crossover better fits your needs. I'll focus on driving range and performance, interior quality and tech, running costs and practicality so you can …
Lynk & Co 02
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lynk & Co 02 and the Toyota C‑HR go head-to-head as compact crossovers that blend urban-friendly dimensions with bold styling. I'll compare the 02 and the Toyota C‑HR across design, driving feel, practicality and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
SsangYong Rexton
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
214 - 216 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
4,850 mm
Length
-
Width
1,960 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
1,825 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
655 - 770 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
184 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
441 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
148 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Toyota
Is the SsangYong Rexton offered with different drivetrains?

The SsangYong Rexton is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.