VS

Suzuki S-Cross vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (110 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Suzuki S-Cross vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Suzuki S-Cross

4.6 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • clearly more power
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki S-Cross is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 253,638 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki S-Cross uses 5.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 10.7 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 490 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers significantly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 665 Nm more.

S-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is clearly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,380 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers markedly more boot space – 555 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries considerably more – 840 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 435 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki S-Cross is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,800
S-Cross

Suzuki S-Cross

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Suzuki S-Cross
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.6 (10 Reviews)
rate
Piero
16 Sept 2026, 14:22:56

Nimble, spacious and economical, it starts quietly and without jerks thanks to the mild-hybrid system.
Robust and not thirsty (personally 5.5 L/100 km combined, with aggressive driving).
I prefer reliability above any other argument, and that of its 4-cylinder engine, with a steel timing chain and intelligent mild-hybrid system, is by far the best in its class.
Ultimately, very, very happy with my choice!

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Peter
24 Aug 2026, 23:05:21

Value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
serpimg_Pd0UC9

Reviews Rolls-Royce Cullinan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota RAV4
VS
When comparing the Suzuki S-Cross to the Toyota RAV4, the former impresses with its affordability and practicality, making it an excellent choice for urban drivers on a budget. The Toyota RAV4, on the other hand, offers a more robust driving experience with superior handling and a reputation for …
Ford Puma
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Suzuki S-Cross each bring unique strengths to the table. The Ford Puma turns heads with its athletic design and responsive EcoBoost engine, ideal for those who prioritize style and dynamic driving. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more pragmatic …
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a straight-talk comparison of the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across to help you decide which crossover suits your lifestyle and budget. The S-Cross is a practical, affordable compact crossover focused on efficiency and comfort, while the Across is a larger plug-in hybrid with stronger …
Suzuki S-Cross
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Dacia Bigster are two compact crossovers aimed at buyers who prioritize practicality, affordability and low running costs. The S-Cross leans on refined packaging, proven reliability and efficient drivetrain options, while the Bigster trades some polish for a larger …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive realm of compact crossovers, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct value propositions for discerning buyers. The ASX impresses with its robust design and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Suzuki S-Cross
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
119 - 138 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,785 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 405 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
81 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drive types are available for the Suzuki S-Cross?

The Suzuki S-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.