Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Suzuki Vitara vs Mercedes C-Class EQ comparison
Compare performance (184 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 58,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Mercedes C-Class EQ?
Suzuki Vitara vs Mercedes C-Class EQ: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Vitara
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki Vitara is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Mercedes C-Class EQ costs 58,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,467 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes C-Class EQ is only slightly more efficient: consuming 14.3 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Suzuki Vitara. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 753 km, about 327 km more than the Suzuki Vitara.
C-Class EQ
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers significantly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 305 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C-Class EQ is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes C-Class EQ delivers substantially more torque with 800 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 493 Nm more.
Vitara
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is clearly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 2,460 kg. The difference is around 1,205 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers markedly more boot space – 470 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes C-Class EQ carries moderately more – 505 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes C-Class EQ is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £58,000
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Suzuki Vitara
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Suzuki Vitara
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Mercedes C-Class EQ
The Mercedes C‑Class EQ blends the familiar poise and luxury of the C‑Class with Mercedes' EQ electric ethos, delivering a quietly refined and modern driving experience. Inside, it pairs upscale materials and tech-forward touches with a composed ride that suits both city commuting and longer journeys.
details
Suzuki Vitara
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
58,000 - 67,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
706 - 753 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
2,460 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,892 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Payload
505 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
489 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.