Tesla Model 3 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Q: How much power does the Tesla Model 3 deliver on the road?

Up to 460 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What are the Tesla Model 3’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Tesla Model 3 consumes around 13 kWh/100km.

Q: How far can the Tesla Model 3 go on a full charge?

According to WLTP, the Tesla Model 3 can travel up to 750 km on a single charge.

Q: What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Enyaq?

Up to 340 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: How much electricity does the Skoda Enyaq use per 100 km?

According to the manufacturer, the Skoda Enyaq requires 14.9 kWh/100km.

Q: What is the electric driving range of the Skoda Enyaq?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 589 km.

Q: What is the Skoda Enyaq’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 585 L fit inside.

Model 3

Skoda Enyaq VS Tesla Model 3 — quick take

Skoda Enyaq VS Tesla Model 3 set up a familiar trade-off: the Enyaq prioritises space, calm and everyday practicality, while the Model 3 pushes efficiency, software and a sharper driving feel. The Enyaq arrives with the composure of an SUV that’s designed to swallow motorway miles with minimal fuss; the Model 3 answers with laser-focused range efficiency and a tech ecosystem that trims time at the charger. For many buyers the choice is emotional as much as rational — do you want a reassuringly roomy cruiser or a minimalist, efficiency-first saloon? In this comparison we focus on how those differences play out in real life rather than on headline figures. Read on to see which car suits routine commutes, family trips and long-distance work travel better.

Enyaq

Driving character and day-to-day dynamics

The Skoda Enyaq feels like a relaxed, heavy-weight cruiser: steering is light, responses steady and the whole car encourages calm progress rather than enthusiastic cornering, while the Tesla Model 3 feels taut, immediate and much more willing to change direction quickly. Model 3 rewards drivers who like crisp turn-in and punchy throttle response, and its regenerative braking and agile chassis make urban manoeuvres feel lively. Enyaq’s weight and softer pedal/steering setup translate into a reassuring, steady ride that soothes rather than excites—good for long-distance commuting but less fun on twisty roads. Both cars are predictable and safe, but the emotional tone differs: measured comfort from the Enyaq versus engaged efficiency from the Model 3. Your preference for sportiness or serenity will determine which one feels more natural every day.

Model 3

Comfort and long-distance behaviour

On long runs the Skoda Enyaq makes itself felt as the quieter, more restful companion with generous rear room and a trunk shaped to accept real luggage without fuss, whereas the Tesla Model 3 leverages its efficiency and Supercharger integration to shorten recharge stress but delivers a firmer, less cocooned ride. The Enyaq’s suspension and cabin insulation let occupants arrive less tired after motorway stints, especially if you regularly carry three across the back seat. Model 3 has made notable gains in noise and ride quality and still wins on energy economy and charging convenience, but taller passengers or those needing lots of luggage will notice the Enyaq’s space advantage. If you live for long trips and passenger comfort, the Enyaq tilts the balance; if you prioritise fewer stops and lower running costs, the Model 3 will feel smarter on route.

Enyaq

Practicality and everyday usability

Practicality is where the Skoda Enyaq plays its strongest hand: wide rear doors, a flat floor and a large, easy-to-pack luggage bay make family life and weekend gear-hauling straightforward, while the Tesla Model 3’s sedan layout keeps overall footprint compact but limits loading flexibility. The Enyaq’s cabin storage and thoughtful details are aimed at people who use their car as a tool — child seats, crates and bulky suitcases all fit with less juggling. Model 3 compensates with smart software aids, a usable frunk and generally clever ergonomics, yet its narrow rear bench and smaller hatch opening change the kind of items you can carry without awkward angling. In short, Enyaq is built around physical space; Model 3 optimises the trip through tech and packaging trade-offs.

Model 3

Cabin feel, controls and tech ecosystem

The Skoda Enyaq presents a more conventional, material-focused cabin with tactile switches and a familiar layout that will please buyers who prefer buttons and obvious ergonomics, while the Tesla Model 3 is unapologetically minimalist and software-led, turning many functions over to a single screen. Enyaq’s trim choices and practical cubbyholes create a sense of everyday quality and usability, but its touchscreen can feel slower and options are sometimes locked behind higher-spec packs. Model 3’s interface is fast, updates over the air and ties seamlessly into charging and navigation, yet the touch-first control philosophy can frustrate those who miss physical climate or shortcut knobs. Put simply: Enyaq favours tangible comfort and ease-of-use; Model 3 favours software polish and rapid evolution — your tolerance for touch controls will be decisive.

Enyaq

Who should consider each car — buyer fit and trade-offs

If your priority is roomy family transport, long-distance cabin calm and a trunk that behaves like a proper utility, the Skoda Enyaq is the more natural fit; it rewards buyers who value tangible comfort and straightforward practicality. If you care most about minimising running costs, accessing a dense fast‑charging network and having the snappier, more tech-driven experience, the Tesla Model 3 will suit you better despite some compromises in rear-seat space and loading geometry. Both cars are competent daily drivers but they serve different instincts: Enyaq for reassurance and usable space, Model 3 for efficiency and software convenience. The technical comparison that follows will translate those character differences into the real‑world numbers that matter when you choose between them.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Elroq

VS

Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …

Skoda Enyaq

VW ID.7

VS

The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Model 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Tesla Model 3 is slightly cheaper – starting at 31,700 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,143 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model 3 is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 750 km, about 161 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers very slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.

Model 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is somewhat lighter – 1,822 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 252 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers only slightly more boot space – 594 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries markedly more – 526 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 193 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model 3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Tesla Model 3

4.3 (8 Reviews)

Trex
13 May 2026, 14:34:19

Excellent traction, relatively low energy consumption, driver-assist systems that are in a class of their own. On top of that, a very responsive steering system.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

dino999
18 Nov 2025, 08:47:05

I wanted to give 0 stars but you can't — unfortunately, it sucks.

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)

Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model 3

Leapmotor B05

VS

The Tesla Model 3 and the Leapmotor B05 take very different approaches to the compact electric sedan market: the Model 3 emphasizes driving dynamics, long range and an advanced tech ecosystem, while the B05 targets affordability and efficient urban use with strong value for money. This comparison …

Tesla Model 3

ZEEKR 7GT

VS

The Tesla Model 3 and Zeekr 7GT take very different approaches to modern EV ownership: the Model 3 is a compact, performance‑leaning sedan known for brisk acceleration, precise handling and Tesla’s ecosystem, while the Zeekr 7GT emphasizes a roomier, more comfort‑oriented experience with premium …

Ford Explorer EV

Skoda Enyaq

VS

Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.

Skoda Enyaq

Kia EV5

VS

Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …

Skoda Enyaq

Volvo EX60

VS

Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …

Tesla Model 3

Subaru Uncharted

VS

Facing the Tesla Model 3 against the Subaru Uncharted highlights two different philosophies: the Model 3 prioritizes electric range, brisk acceleration and a tech‑focused cabin, while the Uncharted emphasizes Subaru’s familiar mix of practicality, ruggedness and all‑weather capability. This short …

Skoda Enyaq

VW ID.7 Touring

VS

Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …

Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …

Costs and Consumption
Price 31,700 - 50,100 £	Price 36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 16.5 kWh/100km	Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range 534 - 750 km	Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Sedan	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors -
Curb weight 1,822 - 1,929 kg	Curb weight 2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity 594 L	Trunk capacity 570 - 585 L
Length -	Length -
Width 1,850 mm	Width 1,879 mm
Height -	Height -
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 302 - 333 kg	Payload 449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 283 - 460 HP	Power HP 190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.1 - 6.2 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed -
Torque 420 - 660 Nm	Torque 350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 208 - 338 kW	Power kW 140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity -

General
Model Year 2025	Model Year 2026
CO2 Efficiency Class A	CO2 Efficiency Class A
Brand Tesla	Brand Skoda

Tesla Model 3 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Tesla Model 3

Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq VS Tesla Model 3 — quick take

Driving character and day-to-day dynamics

Comfort and long-distance behaviour

Practicality and everyday usability

Cabin feel, controls and tech ecosystem

Who should consider each car — buyer fit and trade-offs

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Engine and Performance:

Space and Everyday Use:

Who wins the race in the data check?

Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Tesla Model 3

Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Dimensions and Body

Engine and Performance

General