Compare performance (223 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 29,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or Honda HR-V?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment continues to thrive with compelling contenders like the Honda HR-V and Toyota C-HR. Both models are esteemed for their efficiency, reliability, and modern design. Let’s explore the technical aspects and innovations that set these two vehicles apart.
Under the hood, the Honda HR-V is powered by a full hybrid engine with a power output of 130 HP and a torque of 253 Nm, ensuring a smooth and efficient drive. It boasts a commendable fuel consumption of 5.4 L/100km, contributing to its CO2 efficiency class D with emissions at 122 g/km.
Meanwhile, the Toyota C-HR provides more variety with its engine options, ranging from 140 HP to a more robust 223 HP. It includes both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid configurations, allowing for impressive fuel consumption figures as low as 0.8 L/100km in its plug-in hybrid model, and extends the electric range up to 68 km. The Toyota C-HR thus enjoys better CO2 efficiency classes of B and C, with emissions as low as 17 g/km.
In terms of acceleration, the Honda HR-V takes 10.6 to 10.7 seconds to go from 0 to 100 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR offers a slightly quicker range, with models achieving 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds. Maximum speed for the HR-V is 170 km/h, whereas the C-HR can reach up to 180 km/h, indicative of its performance-oriented hybrid solutions.
Both models share a similar body type as SUVs, each accommodating five passengers comfortably. The Honda HR-V measures 4340 mm in length and 1582 mm in height, delivering a sleek yet utilitarian appearance. On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR stretches slightly longer at 4362 mm, with heights between 1558 and 1564 mm, and a broader stance at 1832 mm in width.
Practicality is paramount in this segment, and both models deliver, albeit with notable differences. The Honda HR-V offers trunk capacities between 320 to 335 liters, adequate for essential cargo needs. The Toyota C-HR, however, provides more with trunk spaces ranging from 424 to 447 liters, depending on the variant, which could be crucial for those needing extra shipment capacity.
In terms of innovation, both SUVs feature an automatic CVT transmission complemented by advanced driving assist technologies typical of modern hybrids. The Honda HR-V keeps it simple with features oriented towards a smooth drive. The Toyota C-HR, with its plug-in hybrid option, offers more advanced hybrid-driven technology, catering to eco-conscious drivers looking for reduced emissions without compromising on performance.
The choice between the Honda HR-V and Toyota C-HR largely depends on buyer priorities. The HR-V shines with its simplicity and balance of features at a promising entry point, ideal for those seeking straightforward efficiency. Meanwhile, the Toyota C-HR stands out with a wider array of options, particularly appealing to tech-savvy drivers interested in hybrid technology and additional performance.
Ultimately, both SUVs exhibit excellent choices in the compact category, ensuring the tradition of blending efficiency with the versatility demanded by today's lifestyles.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota C-HR is barely cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Honda HR-V costs 29,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 608 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Honda HR-V with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers clearly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 92 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.6 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Honda HR-V is only slightly lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 53 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers markedly more boot space – 447 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 128 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR carries very slightly more – 425 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
The Toyota C-HR holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
The Honda HR-V is the sensible compact crossover that blends roomy practicality with a composed, friendly drive, making it an easy pick for buyers who want everyday usability without fuss. It won’t thrill hardcore enthusiasts, but its clever packaging, comfortable cabin and low-key styling make life simpler — and that’s exactly the point.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
Price
29,700 - 35,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
co2
122 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
Curb weight
1,452 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
319 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
Width
-
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
418 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España