Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Toyota C-HR vs Volvo XC60 – Which car suits you better?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Toyota C-HR or Volvo XC60 fits your lifestyle better.
C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota C-HR has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 20057 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Volvo XC60 performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 82 km, about 14 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
XC60
@ Volvo Cars
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 232 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota C-HR is evident lighter – 1505 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 395 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers hardly perceptible more room – 483 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1543 L, which is about 388 L more than the Toyota C-HR.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 clearly perceptible takes the win – 550 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Toyota C-HR proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Toyota C-HR is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £29,100
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC60
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
17 - 115 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4362 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1832 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Toyota C-HR have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.