VS

Volvo EX40 vs Nissan Micra comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (45,200 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or Nissan Micra?

Volvo EX40 vs Nissan Micra: Key differences

Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Nissan Micra

  • significantly cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Micra is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 45,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,257 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Nissan Micra is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.2 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 160 km more than the Nissan Micra.

Micra

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 292 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Nissan Micra takes 8 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 425 Nm more.

EX40

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Micra is significantly lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 588 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX40 carries slightly more – 480 kg compared to 408 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Volvo EX40
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

details
serpimg_LJ8L9f

Reviews Nissan Micra

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
Hyundai Inster
Nissan Micra
VS
The Hyundai Inster hustles through town with roomy practicality and wallet-friendly running costs, while the Nissan Micra scores points for sharper handling, cheeky styling and a more engaging turbo feel. For no-nonsense commuting pick the Inster; if you crave personality and a bit of fun behind …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX30 and Volvo EX40 helps buyers choose between a compact, city-focused electric crossover and a slightly larger, more practical electric SUV. The EX30 prioritises agility, lower cost and urban ease, while the EX40 offers more interior space, range and family-friendly …
BMW iX1
Volvo EX40
VS
Choosing between the BMW iX1 and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you want a compact electric SUV that emphasizes BMW’s sporty, driver-focused dynamics or one that prioritizes Volvo’s calm, safety-minded comfort. Both deliver premium EV credentials, but they differ in ride character, interior …
Renault R5
Nissan Micra
VS
The cheeky, retro-modern Renault 5 squares up against the urbane, sensible Nissan Micra — two compact contenders fighting for your city keys. We’ll compare style, practicality, driving feel and running costs to find out which is the smarter buy for everyday life.
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
Deciding between the Volvo C40 (commonly called the C40 Recharge) and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you prefer a coupé‑style compact electric with sharper styling or a more conventional compact electric SUV focused on practicality. This quick comparison will run through range, interior …
Volvo EX40
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,200 - 56,000 £
Price
24,000 - 29,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Curb weight
1,452 - 1,527 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,863 mm
Width
1,774 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 480 kg
Payload
403 - 408 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EX40 have?

The Volvo EX40 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.