Compare performance (455 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (62,300 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo V90 or Toyota C-HR+?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota C-HR+ is significantly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Volvo V90 costs 62,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,314 £.
As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 519 km more than the Volvo V90.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V90 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 343 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V90 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the Toyota C-HR+ takes 5.2 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V90 delivers considerably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 371 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,075 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo V90 offers a bit more boot space – 488 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries clearly more – 655 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 140 kg.
The Toyota C-HR+ stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo V90 blends Scandinavian elegance with estate practicality, delivering a composed ride and an interior that's both luxurious and perfectly sensible. Packed with clever storage and top-flight safety kit, it's the choice for buyers who want to look classy while hauling life's chaos — without making a fuss about it.
detailsThe Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
62,300 - 71,700 £
|
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
18 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,075 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
488 L
|
Trunk capacity
416 L
|
|
Length
4,945 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
|
Height
1,472 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,454 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
515 kg
|
Payload
550 - 655 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
398 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 5.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
659 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
293 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Toyota
|