Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo XC60 vs VW T-Roc – Which model is better for everyday use?
Two cars, one duel: Volvo XC60 meets VW T-Roc.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
XC60
@ Volvo Cars
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW T-Roc has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 22753 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 2.70 L per 100 km.
T-Roc
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 305 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 4 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs a bit better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 32 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls significantly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 459 Nm difference.
XC60
@ Volvo Cars
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW T-Roc is distinct lighter – 1465 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 435 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers minimal more room – 483 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs a bit better – up to 1543 L, which is about 193 L more than the VW T-Roc.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 hardly perceptible takes the win – 550 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £49,200
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
VW T-Roc
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
Volvo XC60
VW T-Roc
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
Price
26400 - 38000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
|
|
Length
4708 mm
|
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
|
|
Width
1902 mm
|
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
|
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
|
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
VW
|
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?
The Volvo XC60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.