Compare performance (150 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Cross or MINI Countryman?
In the world of compact SUVs, the 2024 MINI Countryman and VW T-Cross are turning heads with their distinct features and impressive capabilities. While both vehicles offer versatility and practicality, they cater to slightly different tastes and preferences. Let's delve into the technical aspects, performance, and innovative features of these two automotive marvels.
The MINI Countryman is known for its wide array of engine options, including petrol, diesel, mild hybrid, and an fully electric variant. With horsepower ranging from 163 to an imposing 313 HP, drivers can enjoy a spirited ride whether they choose the front-wheel or all-wheel drive option. The electric version offers a commendable range of up to 462 km, making it a great choice for eco-conscious drivers.
On the other hand, the VW T-Cross stays true to the petrol route with engines delivering between 95 to 150 HP. Exclusively front-wheel drive, it offers a manual and a dual-clutch automatic gearbox, striking a balance between efficiency and drivability. While the T-Cross might not match the outright power of the Countryman, it provides adequate punch for urban driving and open highways, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.4 seconds.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the MINI Countryman achieves between 4.6 and 7.8 L/100km depending on the chosen powertrain, with the electric version consuming around 15.7-16.8 kWh/100km. These figures position the Countryman as an efficient yet powerful option within its segment.
The VW T-Cross remains slightly more consistent in its fuel economy, consuming between 5.6 to 6 L/100km. This consistent fuel efficiency, along with its practicality, makes the T-Cross a smart choice for city-goers who prioritize cost-effective driving.
In terms of dimensions, the MINI Countryman is the larger of the two, measuring 4445 mm in length, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. With a trunk capacity of up to 505 liters, it's designed to accommodate everything from groceries to weekend getaways.
The VW T-Cross offers a slightly more compact form at 4127 mm in length, with a trunk capacity of 455 liters. This makes it better suited for navigating tight city streets while still offering sufficient storage for everyday needs.
The MINI Countryman carries forward the iconic styling of the MINI brand, blending classic elements with modern features. Its advanced technological offerings and customizable options make it a compelling choice for those who enjoy a personalized driving experience.
VW's T-Cross, on the other hand, appeals with its straightforward design and practical features tailored for urban lifestyles. While it may not boast the extensive tech features of the Countryman, its user-friendly interface and design simplicity are major draws for many drivers.
Choosing between the MINI Countryman and VW T-Cross ultimately boils down to personal priorities. For those seeking a versatile vehicle with a wide range of power and eco-friendly options, along with larger dimensions, the Countryman stands out. Meanwhile, the T-Cross appeals to drivers who prioritize efficiency, practicality, and nimble city maneuverability.
Both the MINI Countryman and VW T-Cross offer impressive packages, ensuring that regardless of choice, drivers will enjoy a capable and enjoyable compact SUV experience.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW T-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the MINI Countryman costs 30,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,691 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MINI Countryman uses 4.6 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman offers considerably more power – delivering 313 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Countryman delivers substantially more torque with 494 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 244 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is clearly lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,570 kg. The difference is around 303 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MINI Countryman offers marginally more boot space – 505 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Countryman carries very slightly more – 500 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The MINI Countryman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.
details
The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
|
Price
30,100 - 45,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
|
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,444 - 4,447 mm
|
|
Width
1,784 mm
|
Width
1,843 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,645 - 1,661 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,450 - 1,530 L
|
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Payload
460 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 10.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
208 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, G, A
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
MINI
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España