Compare performance (150 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or MINI Countryman?
In the contemporary compact SUV arena, two nameplates rise to prominence: the MINI Countryman and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles exude charm, but when it comes to engineering, performance, and innovation, how do they really stack up against each other? Here we delve into an incisive comparison of these dynamic models, both tailored for the 2024 model year.
The MINI Countryman leaps forward with a variety of engine choices, ranging from petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV), diesel MHEV, to a pure electric drive. The standout is the 313 HP electric variant, which offers brisk acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 5.4 seconds, ensuring a thrilling drive. It also impresses with an electric range of up to 462 kilometers. For traditionalists, the petrol and diesel engines range up to 170 and 163 HP respectively, each with a dual-clutch automatic transmission for seamless shifts.
On the flip side, the VW T-Roc presents a mix of petrol and diesel engines, boasting power outputs from a modest 115 HP up to a sprightly 300 HP. The T-Roc's 300 HP variant accelerates from 0-100 km/h in a swift 4.9 seconds, courtesy of its all-wheel-drive system and dual-clutch automatic transmission.
Fuel efficiency is paramount in modern vehicles, and here both models exhibit innovation. The MINI Countryman's electric variant shows a remarkable efficiency of 15.7 kWh/100 km. Its petrol engines also deliver competitive fuel consumption figures, with as low as 4.6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions starting at 120 g/km, making it a clean choice.
Conversely, the T-Roc delivers fuel economy figures from 4.7 to 6.3 L/100 km, depending on the engine, with CO2 emissions landing between 125 and 194 g/km. Though not as low as the Countryman's, it's efficient enough for those prioritizing petrol power.
For those requiring practicality, both SUVs cater admirably. The MINI Countryman offers a decent trunk capacity of up to 505 liters, slightly exceeding that of the T-Roc's maximum of 445 liters. Both models comfortably seat five passengers, though the Countryman's slightly larger dimensions give it an edge in interior spaciousness.
In terms of technology, the Countryman and T-Roc offer differing attractions. The Countryman's cutting-edge infotainment system with an intuitive interface pairs seamlessly with its eco-friendly powertrains, highlighting MINI's commitment to sustainable innovation.
The T-Roc, however, packs a punch with its array of driver-assistance systems such as adaptive cruise control and park assist, enhancing safety and ease of use. VW’s latest connectivity offerings ensure drivers remain in touch with the digital world.
Ultimately, choosing between the MINI Countryman and the VW T-Roc comes down to individual preference. The Countryman caters to the eco-conscious with its electric variant and lower emissions, along with a stylish and spacious build. Meanwhile, the T-Roc beckons those seeking robust traditional performance and a suite of advanced technology to make driving both fun and safe.
Both models represent the pinnacle of their marque's engineering innovation and display the modern compact SUV's ability to offer versatile and engaging driving experiences. The decision lies in aligning their unique attributes with your driving desires.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW T-Roc is somewhat cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the MINI Countryman costs 30,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,647 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MINI Countryman uses 4.6 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman offers substantially more power – delivering 313 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Countryman delivers considerably more torque with 494 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 244 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is barely lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,570 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MINI Countryman offers significantly more boot space – 505 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 221 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries barely more – 515 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The MINI Countryman stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
Price
30,100 - 45,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,444 - 4,447 mm
|
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
Width
1,843 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,645 - 1,661 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,450 - 1,530 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Payload
460 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 10.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
208 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, G, A
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
MINI
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España