Mitsubishi ASX alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mitsubishi ASX, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mitsubishi ASX

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mitsubishi ASX and are good next research steps.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 426 km
details

Suzuki Vitara as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi ASX

Comparing the ASX and Vitara helps buyers choose between two compact SUVs with different strengths: the ASX leans toward comfort and value, while the Vitara emphasizes nimble handling and fuel efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in space, safety, economy and driving feel so you can pick the better fit.

The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.

Quick data check: Suzuki Vitara

  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space
  • somewhat more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
Compare directly with Suzuki Vitara
from £29,100
HR-V

Honda HR-V

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 131 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 L/100km
details

Honda HR-V as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi ASX

In the compact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mitsubishi ASX both bring unique strengths to the table. The HR-V shines with its sleek design and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a standout choice for urban drivers who value style and economy. On the other hand, the ASX offers robust performance and a user-friendly infotainment system, appealing to those who prioritize practicality and technological features in their daily commute.

The Honda HR-V is a compact crossover that blends practical versatility with a comfortable, refined cabin, making it a strong choice for daily driving and weekend trips. Its clever packaging and easy-to-use features give owners flexible cargo space and a confidence-inspiring driving experience without feeling fussy.

Quick data check: Honda HR-V

  • visibly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
Compare directly with Honda HR-V
from £25,200
Grandis

Mitsubishi Grandis

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6.1 L/100km
details

Mitsubishi Grandis as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi ASX

Comparing the Mitsubishi ASX and the Mitsubishi Grandis helps you decide whether you need a compact crossover that’s easy in town or a roomy MPV designed for family duty. I’ll point out the key differences in space, driving character, fuel economy and running costs so you can quickly see which fits your needs.

The Mitsubishi Grandis is a no-nonsense MPV that hides a surprisingly sleek profile, making family duty look almost stylish. It’s spacious, easy to drive, and built to shrug off daily chaos, though the cabin feels dated and it prefers a relaxed cruise to any hot-hatch antics.

Quick data check: Mitsubishi Grandis

  • slightly cheaper
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
Compare directly with Mitsubishi Grandis
from £21,400
Captur

Renault Captur

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Renault Captur as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi ASX

Choosing between the Mitsubishi ASX and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward, durable value and simple packaging (ASX) or a more stylish, configurable small SUV with clever cabin packaging and tech (Captur). I’ll quickly compare how they stack up for space, comfort, economy, running costs and driving feel so you can pick the one that suits your daily needs.

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

Quick data check: Renault Captur

  • very slightly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
  • marginally cheaper
Compare directly with Renault Captur
from £21,800
S-Cross

Suzuki S-Cross

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
details

Suzuki S-Cross as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi ASX

In the competitive realm of compact crossovers, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct value propositions for discerning buyers. The ASX impresses with its robust design and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross stands out for its fuel efficiency and advanced safety features, appealing to those who prioritize economy and peace of mind on the road.

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

Quick data check: Suzuki S-Cross

  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit more trunk space
  • marginally lighter
Compare directly with Suzuki S-Cross
from £23,700
Yaris Cross

Toyota Yaris Cross

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
details

Toyota Yaris Cross as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi ASX

In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi ASX stands out with its robust design and practicality, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. In contrast, the Toyota Yaris Cross combines sporty aesthetics with impressive fuel efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers without compromising on style. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, offering unique strengths that cater to diverse customer needs.

The Toyota Yaris Cross blends the maneuverability of a small hatch with the higher driving position and practicality of a crossover, wrapped in Toyota's dependable build quality. It suits urban buyers who need easy parking, flexible cargo space and a comfortable, economical daily driver.

Quick data check: Toyota Yaris Cross

  • very slightly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
  • barely lighter
Compare directly with Toyota Yaris Cross

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mitsubishi ASX head-to-head against similar models.

Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Honda HR-V
Mitsubishi ASX
VS
Mitsubishi ASX
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Mitsubishi ASX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.