Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Abarth 500 595 695 vs Renault Clio - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (155 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (32600 £ vs 16600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 500 595 695 or Renault Clio?
500 595 695
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Clio has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £ , while the Abarth 500 595 695 costs 32600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15977 £.
Clio
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio has a minimal edge – offering 158 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Abarth 500 595 695 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Clio performs to a small extent better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Abarth 500 595 695 tops out at 155 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Abarth 500 595 695 pulls somewhat stronger with 235 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
500 595 695
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Clio offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Renault Clio is evident lighter – 1124 kg compared to 1410 kg. The difference is around 286 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Clio offers clearly more room – 391 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 206 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio performs significantly better – up to 1176 L, which is about 626 L more than the Abarth 500 595 695.
When it comes to payload, Renault Clio to a small extent takes the win – 463 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Renault Clio proves to be performs better in key areas and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Renault Clio is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £16,600
Renault Clio
Abarth 500 595 695
Renault Clio
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Abarth 500 595 695
The Abarth 500, particularly in its 595 and 695 renditions, captures the spirit of Italian motoring with its compact yet aggressive design. Known for its lively performance and distinctive styling, this little powerhouse is a joy to drive, offering an engaging experience that appeals to enthusiasts. With its rich motorsport heritage, the Abarth 500 embodies the essence of fun and excitement on both the streets and the race track.
details
Renault Clio
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
details
Abarth 500 595 695
Renault Clio
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32600 - 39400 £
|
Price
16600 - 23700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
37.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
92 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
3
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1410 - 1435 kg
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
185 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
3673 mm
|
Length
4053 - 4116 mm
|
|
Width
1682 mm
|
Width
1768 - 1798 mm
|
|
Height
1518 mm
|
Height
1440 - 1451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
550 L
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1176 L
|
|
Payload
370 - 385 kg
|
Payload
398 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
155 HP
|
Power HP
67 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 17.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
155 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
114 kW
|
Power kW
49 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Abarth
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Abarth 500 595 695 offered with different drivetrains?
The Abarth 500 595 695 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.