Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alfa Romeo Junior or Skoda Enyaq fits your lifestyle better.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 12386 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 15.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.
As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs noticeable better – achieving up to 587 km, about 177 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a slightly edge – offering 340 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs slightly better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls significantly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is significantly lighter – 1380 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 622 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeable more room – 585 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – up to 1710 L, which is about 430 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq somewhat takes the win – 509 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 89 kg.
Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
detailsThe Škoda Enyaq represents a bold step for the Czech manufacturer, embracing a stylish design and environmental consciousness with its electric powertrain. Inside, the cabin offers a blend of comfort and advanced technology, creating a modern driving experience. With its spacious interior and practical features, the Enyaq is perfect for families or anyone looking for a practical yet luxurious electric vehicle.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 41600 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.