VS

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Skoda Enyaq?

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Junior

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Junior

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Alfa Romeo Junior is clearly cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,748 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is barely more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the Alfa Romeo Junior. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 179 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm more.

Junior

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is considerably lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 694 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries clearly more – 526 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 106 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Junior

The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.

details
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Interieur

Reviews Alfa Romeo Junior

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
GMarco
17 Jun 2026, 09:14:42

The Junior's design is more modern, although the three-cylinder leaves me puzzled.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jerzy
9 May 2026, 04:07:35

The car is a pleasure to drive — you don't want to get out. The navigation guides excellently, but Polish names are mispronounced. The car doesn't have cornering lights. The matrix headlights are very good.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Ford Capri
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Comparing the Capri and the Enyaq is like putting a classic, driver-focused sports coupe head-to-head with a modern electric SUV designed for space, comfort and low running costs. If you’re after character and a sporty drive, the Capri delivers the feel; if you need range, practicality and everyday …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Quick comparison between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which fits your needs. Note: I don’t find any official Skoda model called “Epiq” — did you mean the Skoda Kamiq, Kodiaq, or another Škoda model?
Alfa Romeo Junior
Peugeot 2008
VS
Putting the Alfa Romeo Junior against the Peugeot 2008 highlights a clash of eras: the Junior’s vintage Italian character and driver-focused feel versus the 2008’s modern, practical crossover sensibility. Choose the Junior when you want style, engagement and period charm; choose the 2008 for space, …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 119 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,781 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
390 - 420 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
146 - 280 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Junior have?

The Alfa Romeo Junior is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.