@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Mazda CX-30 – Which car suits you better?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alfa Romeo Tonale or Mazda CX-30 fits your lifestyle better.

Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

The Battle of Compact SUVs: Alfa Romeo Tonale vs. Mazda CX-30

In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Alfa Romeo Tonale and the Mazda CX-30 stand out as two distinct vehicles that cater to diverse needs. Both exhibit striking design philosophies and technological advancements, offering a robust blend of power, efficiency, and innovation. But how do they match up against each other in their 2024 incarnations? Let's delve into the details.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

The Alfa Romeo Tonale and Mazda CX-30 both exude unique design languages. The Tonale measures 4,528 mm in length, 1,835 mm in width, and 1,614 mm in height, making it slightly larger than the CX-30, which stands at 4,395 mm in length, 1,795 mm in width, and 1,540 mm in height. This size difference translates into an airier interior for the Tonale, appealing to those who prioritize space. Both models offer seating for five, establishing them as family-friendly choices.

Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Powertrain and Performance

The Tonale offers an impressive variety of engine options, including a plug-in hybrid and mild hybrid petrol versions, with power outputs ranging from 130 to 280 HP. This flexibility, paired with an all-wheel or front-wheel drive system, allows the Tonale to cater to a broad array of driving needs. The plug-in hybrid's 6.2 seconds acceleration to 100 km/h and an electric range of 63 km highlight its performance capabilities.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a petrol mild-hybrid engine. Power ratings vary from 140 to 186 HP, with an acceleration time ranging between 8.3 to 10.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. It's slightly behind the Tonale in terms of raw power, but the CX-30 excels in delivering a smooth, engaging driving experience with its SkyActiv technology.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Efficiency and Eco-friendliness

The Tonale's plug-in hybrid model shines with an outstanding consumption rate of 1.3 L/100 km and a CO2 emission rate as low as 30 g/km, placing it in the B efficiency class. The other engines range in consumption from 5.3 to 5.6 L/100 km, with corresponding CO2 outputs placing them in D and E classes.

The CX-30, while lacking a plug-in hybrid, still maintains efficient operation with its mild hybrid configuration, posting consumption figures between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions from 129 to 148 g/km. This positions the Mazda largely within the D and E efficiency classes.

Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Technical Innovations

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is at the forefront of innovation with its integration of advanced hybrid technology and dual-clutch automatic transmission. It also offers an interactive driving experience with its cutting-edge infotainment systems.

Mazda's CX-30 capitalizes on its SkyActiv technology to enhance vehicle dynamics and fuel efficiency without compromising on performance. The addition of G-Vectoring Control Plus ensures improved handling, promising a more connected driving experience.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Practicality and Usability

In terms of practicality, the Tonale provides a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 385 to 500 liters compared to the CX-30's 422 to 430 liters, but compensates with a superior payload capacity of up to 535 kg. The Mazda’s slightly smaller dimensions might translate into easier maneuverability in urban settings.

Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between the Alfa Romeo Tonale and Mazda CX-30 hinges on individual preferences and priorities. The Tonale is ideal for those who seek cutting-edge hybrid technology, sportier performance, and a more spacious cabin. Alternatively, the CX-30 is an excellent choice for drivers who appreciate a refined driving experience combined with Mazda’s hallmark efficiency and reliability. Both models, however, demonstrate that innovation and practicality are very much alive in the compact SUV segment.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale costs 35000 £. That’s a price difference of around 9737 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Tonale manages with 1.30 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.40 L per 100 km.

Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Tonale has a evident edge – offering 280 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 94 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Tonale is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.20 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Tonale performs minimal better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Tonale pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1600 kg. The difference is around 145 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alfa Romeo Tonale offers somewhat more room – 500 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Alfa Romeo Tonale performs slight better – up to 1550 L, which is about 144 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Alfa Romeo Tonale barely noticeable takes the win – 535 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Alfa Romeo Tonale shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £35,000
Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Alfa Romeo Tonale

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 130 - 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.3 - 5.6 L
  • Electric Range : 62 km
details

Alfa Romeo Tonale

The Alfa Romeo Tonale embodies the brand's timeless elegance and sporty DNA, captivating drivers with its bold design and dynamic presence on the road. Inside, the Tonale impresses with a perfect blend of luxury and cutting-edge technology, offering a sophisticated driving experience that remains true to the Alfa Romeo spirit. With its agile performance and distinctive character, the Tonale stands out in the competitive SUV market, appealing to those who seek both style and substance.

details
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_017-62cea8da1df0f @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_014-62cea9188c509 @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_011-62cea94b3aab6 @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_015-62cea900a8b76 @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_020-62cea1ddc130d @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_021-62cea1cc66ba6 @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Mazda CX-30
Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
35000 - 53200 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.3 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
62 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
12 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
30 - 140 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1600 - 1910 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
385 - 500 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4528 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1835 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1614 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1430 - 1550 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
510 - 535 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 280 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.2 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
194 - 212 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 - 206 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Tonale have?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.