VS

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (268 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (35500 £ vs 25200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Tonale or Mazda CX-30?

Tonale

The Battle of Compact SUVs: Alfa Romeo Tonale vs. Mazda CX-30

In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Alfa Romeo Tonale and the Mazda CX-30 stand out as two distinct vehicles that cater to diverse needs. Both exhibit striking design philosophies and technological advancements, offering a robust blend of power, efficiency, and innovation. But how do they match up against each other in their 2024 incarnations? Let's delve into the details.

CX-30

Design and Dimensions

The Alfa Romeo Tonale and Mazda CX-30 both exude unique design languages. The Tonale measures 4,528 mm in length, 1,835 mm in width, and 1,614 mm in height, making it slightly larger than the CX-30, which stands at 4,395 mm in length, 1,795 mm in width, and 1,540 mm in height. This size difference translates into an airier interior for the Tonale, appealing to those who prioritize space. Both models offer seating for five, establishing them as family-friendly choices.

Tonale

Powertrain and Performance

The Tonale offers an impressive variety of engine options, including a plug-in hybrid and mild hybrid petrol versions, with power outputs ranging from 130 to 280 HP. This flexibility, paired with an all-wheel or front-wheel drive system, allows the Tonale to cater to a broad array of driving needs. The plug-in hybrid's 6.2 seconds acceleration to 100 km/h and an electric range of 63 km highlight its performance capabilities.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a petrol mild-hybrid engine. Power ratings vary from 140 to 186 HP, with an acceleration time ranging between 8.3 to 10.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. It's slightly behind the Tonale in terms of raw power, but the CX-30 excels in delivering a smooth, engaging driving experience with its SkyActiv technology.

CX-30

Efficiency and Eco-friendliness

The Tonale's plug-in hybrid model shines with an outstanding consumption rate of 1.3 L/100 km and a CO2 emission rate as low as 30 g/km, placing it in the B efficiency class. The other engines range in consumption from 5.3 to 5.6 L/100 km, with corresponding CO2 outputs placing them in D and E classes.

The CX-30, while lacking a plug-in hybrid, still maintains efficient operation with its mild hybrid configuration, posting consumption figures between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions from 129 to 148 g/km. This positions the Mazda largely within the D and E efficiency classes.

Tonale

Technical Innovations

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is at the forefront of innovation with its integration of advanced hybrid technology and dual-clutch automatic transmission. It also offers an interactive driving experience with its cutting-edge infotainment systems.

Mazda's CX-30 capitalizes on its SkyActiv technology to enhance vehicle dynamics and fuel efficiency without compromising on performance. The addition of G-Vectoring Control Plus ensures improved handling, promising a more connected driving experience.

CX-30

Practicality and Usability

In terms of practicality, the Tonale provides a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 385 to 500 liters compared to the CX-30's 422 to 430 liters, but compensates with a superior payload capacity of up to 535 kg. The Mazda’s slightly smaller dimensions might translate into easier maneuverability in urban settings.

Tonale

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between the Alfa Romeo Tonale and Mazda CX-30 hinges on individual preferences and priorities. The Tonale is ideal for those who seek cutting-edge hybrid technology, sportier performance, and a more spacious cabin. Alternatively, the CX-30 is an excellent choice for drivers who appreciate a refined driving experience combined with Mazda’s hallmark efficiency and reliability. Both models, however, demonstrate that innovation and practicality are very much alive in the compact SUV segment.

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Tonale

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • evident more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • somewhat more trunk space

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • distinct quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • hardly perceptible lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Tonale costs 35500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10251 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Tonale manages with 3.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

Tonale

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Tonale has a evident edge – offering 268 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale takes 10.90 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Tonale pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1600 kg. The difference is around 145 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alfa Romeo Tonale offers somewhat more room – 500 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.

When it comes to payload, Alfa Romeo Tonale barely noticeable takes the win – 535 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £35,500
Tonale

Alfa Romeo Tonale

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 130 - 268 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.4 - 5.6 L
  • Electric Range : 62 km
details

Alfa Romeo Tonale

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Alfa Romeo Tonale embodies the brand's timeless elegance and sporty DNA, captivating drivers with its bold design and dynamic presence on the road. Inside, the Tonale impresses with a perfect blend of luxury and cutting-edge technology, offering a sophisticated driving experience that remains true to the Alfa Romeo spirit. With its agile performance and distinctive character, the Tonale stands out in the competitive SUV market, appealing to those who seek both style and substance.

details
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_017-62cea8da1df0f
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_014-62cea9188c509
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_011-62cea94b3aab6
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_015-62cea900a8b76
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_020-62cea1ddc130d
20220713_ar_tonale_veloce_021-62cea1cc66ba6

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Alfa Romeo Tonale

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Mika Marjanen
8 Dec 2025, 16:14:54

The Tonale is bigger, more powerful, better-looking, and has a nicer, more spacious interior. I’ve driven both — the Toyota is bland and scentless, and simply a poorer drive.

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
35500 - 53200 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
62 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
77 - 138 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1600 - 1910 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
385 - 500 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1835 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 - 535 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 268 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 - 197 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025 - 2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Tonale
VS
In the battle of modern Italian engineering, the Alfa Romeo Junior takes on the Alfa Romeo Tonale, showcasing distinct personalities within Alfa's lineup. The Junior dazzles with its classic style and sporty dynamics, appealing to purists and enthusiasts alike, while the Tonale offers a more …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek design and spirited driving dynamics that appeal to enthusiasts, while the Toyota C-HR offers a bold aesthetic and a reputation for reliability. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced infotainment features, …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the burgeoning landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda ZR-V and Mazda CX-30 emerge as fierce contenders, each bringing distinct attributes to the table. The Honda ZR-V excels in practicality, offering a roomier interior and a straightforward approach to driving comfort, making it a family-friendly …
Mazda CX-30
MG ZS
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the MG ZS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Tonale have?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.