VS

Audi A1 vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (207 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (20,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A1 or Ford Puma?

Audi A1 vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Audi A1

2.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

A1

When it comes to compact cars, the Audi A1 and Ford Puma both stand out in their own right. The A1, a premium hatchback from Audi, showcases a blend of sophistication and engineering excellence, while the Ford Puma offers a sporty design with SUV characteristics, making it a versatile choice for various lifestyles. In this article, we will compare these two remarkable vehicles across various aspects, including technical specifications, performance features, and innovative technologies.

Puma

Design and Body Type

The Audi A1 is classified as a hatchback, measuring 4046 mm in length and 1756 mm in width, offering a sleek and refined appearance typical of Audi's design philosophy. Its compact size and stylish silhouette make it suitable for urban environments, while the Practical 335-liter trunk capacity adds to its usability.

In contrast, the Ford Puma is classified as an SUV, exhibiting a slightly larger form with lengths ranging from 4186 mm to 4226 mm and a width of 1805 mm. This additional height and bulk contribute to a more commanding presence on the road. The Puma’s trunk capacity is noteworthy at a maximum of 523 liters, highlighting its practicality for families and adventurers alike.

A1

Powertrains and Performance

The Audi A1 offers several power options, with engines ranging from a 1.0-liter three-cylinder producing 95 HP to a more powerful 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder generating 207 HP. The choice between manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions ensures both driving pleasure and convenience. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies from 6.5 seconds in the top variant to around 11.5 seconds in base models, while top speeds reach up to 245 km/h.

Ford, on the other hand, presents the Puma with a slightly different approach. Available with both petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV) and fully electric engines, the Puma’s petrol options range from 125 to 168 HP. The Puma also shines with impressive acceleration, boasting a 0-100 km/h time as low as 7.4 seconds in its most powerful trims. The top speed can reach up to 210 km/h, showcasing the Puma's sporty characteristics.

Puma

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

The Audi A1 appeals to performance enthusiasts with respectable fuel consumption figures, ranging from 5.3 to 6.5 L/100 km, depending on the engine choice, and CO2 emissions ranging from 120 to 147 g/km. These statistics reinforce Audi's commitment to blending performance with efficiency.

Conversely, the Ford Puma is positioned as a more eco-friendly choice, especially with its electric variants. The petrol engines show a competitive fuel consumption of 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, while the electric version has a range of 364 to 376 km on a full charge, with a battery capacity of 43 kWh. The Puma excels in emissions, particularly with zero emissions from its electric model, categorized as "A" in CO2 efficiency.

A1

Interior Quality and Technology

Inside, the Audi A1 boasts a premium cabin with high-quality materials and advanced infotainment features. Designed for five occupants, it includes a user-friendly MMI system that offers smartphone integration and a suite of driver assistance technologies.

The Ford Puma also prioritizes comfort and technology, with an emphasis on practicality. Its spacious interior can comfortably seat five, and it features Ford’s latest SYNC infotainment system, providing seamless connectivity and navigation options. The compact SUV's higher seating position enhances visibility and driving pleasure, making it suitable for various terrains.

Puma

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

In summary, choosing between the Audi A1 and Ford Puma ultimately depends on your needs and preferences. The A1 offers a premium hatchback experience with top-notch performance and luxury, appealing to those who prioritize style and brand prestige. Meanwhile, the Ford Puma stands out with its versatility, practicality, and eco-friendly options, making it an appealing choice for families and environmentally conscious consumers.

Both cars reflect their manufacturers’ dedication to innovation, quality, and driving pleasure, ensuring that potential buyers have compelling choices in the compact car segment. Test-driving both vehicles will ultimately provide valuable insights, helping you make the right decision for your lifestyle and driving needs.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A1

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi A1 is slightly cheaper – starting at 20,000 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,943 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A1 uses 5.2 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A1 offers slightly more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A1 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A1 delivers marginally more torque with 320 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

A1

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A1 is moderately lighter – 1,175 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 141 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Audi A1 carries marginally more – 470 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A1 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,000
A1

Audi A1

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 6.4 L/100km
details
Audi A1
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A1

The Audi A1 is a compact premium hatch that wraps Audi's polished design and surprisingly grown-up cabin into a city-friendly package. It’s poised and fun to drive, a smart pick for buyers who want luxury flair without the fuss of a bigger car — and it makes tight parking feel almost enjoyable.

details
A186760_medium
A186764_medium
A186752_medium
A186753_medium
A186756_medium
A186776_medium

Reviews Audi A1

2.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Audi A1
VW Golf
VS
Tiny premium flair meets mainstream mastery: the Audi A1 brings city-class style, crisp interiors and nimble handling, while the VW Golf remains the benchmark hatchback — spacious, sensible and hard to beat. We pit the posh A1 against the practical Golf to find out which one earns your money, your …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who crave a more dynamic experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek aesthetics and practicality, offering a more refined ride and …
Ford Puma
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and Toyota Yaris Cross both offer compelling features and distinctive styling that appeal to urban drivers. The Puma shines with its striking design and engaging driving dynamics, while the Yaris Cross impresses with its hybrid efficiency and …
Audi A1
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,000 - 28,800 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
118 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,175 - 1,365 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
335 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,740 - 1,756 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
410 - 470 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 207 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 11.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 320 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
70 - 152 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the Audi A1 have?

The Audi A1 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.