Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A6 Limousine vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (367 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (47,600 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 Limousine or Ford Puma?
Audi A6 Limousine vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A6 Limousine
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Audi A6 Limousine costs 47,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,657 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A6 Limousine uses 2.2 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 312 km more than the Audi A6 Limousine.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 Limousine offers clearly more power – delivering 367 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 199 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 Limousine is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 Limousine delivers clearly more torque with 580 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 290 Nm more.
A6 Limousine
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,845 kg. The difference is around 529 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 492 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi A6 Limousine carries markedly more – 625 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 156 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 Limousine is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £47,600
Audi A6 Limousine
Audi A6 Limousine
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 Limousine
The Audi A6 cuts a clean, purposeful silhouette with an interior that feels like a quiet, high-tech office on wheels—luxurious materials and clever gadgets make long journeys surprisingly pleasant. It balances composed, confident driving with enough flair to keep you entertained, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want executive polish without showing off.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Audi A6 Limousine
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
47,600 - 68,100 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.2 - 7.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
97 - 105 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
49 - 166 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,845 - 2,220 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 492 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
535 - 625 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 8.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
340 - 580 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.