Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi e-tron GT vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (843 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (93,300 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Ford Puma?
e-tron GT
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 69,428 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.9 kWh/100km for the Audi e-tron GT. That’s a difference of about 4.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi e-tron GT offers visibly more range – reaching up to 617 km, about 200 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT offers substantially more power – delivering 843 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 675 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi e-tron GT delivers clearly more torque with 1,027 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 737 Nm more.
e-tron GT
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,355 kg. The difference is around 1,039 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 118 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi e-tron GT carries barely more – 485 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Audi e-tron GT
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Audi e-tron GT
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
93,300 - 137,600 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,355 - 2,395 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 485 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
625 - 1,027 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.