VS

Audi e-tron GT vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (843 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (93,300 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Skoda Enyaq?

Audi e-tron GT vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Audi e-tron GT

  • significantly more power
  • barely more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

e-tron GT

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq is significantly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 56,494 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.9 kWh/100km for the Audi e-tron GT. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi e-tron GT offers barely more range – reaching up to 617 km, about 28 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT offers significantly more power – delivering 843 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 503 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi e-tron GT delivers noticeably more torque with 1,027 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 348 Nm more.

e-tron GT

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Skoda Enyaq offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is moderately lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,355 kg. The difference is around 281 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 180 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries only slightly more – 526 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Audi e-tron GT
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi e-tron GT

The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Audi e-tron GT
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
93,300 - 137,600 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,355 - 2,395 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,964 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 - 485 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
625 - 1,027 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.