VS

BMW 3 Series Touring vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (530 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 3 Series Touring or Ford Puma?

BMW 3 Series Touring vs Ford Puma: Key differences

BMW 3 Series Touring

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Series Touring

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the BMW 3 Series Touring costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 3 Series Touring uses 2.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 320 km more than the BMW 3 Series Touring.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers substantially more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 362 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 3 Series Touring is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 3 Series Touring delivers considerably more torque with 700 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm more.

3 Series Touring

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,650 kg. The difference is around 334 kg.

When it comes to payload, the BMW 3 Series Touring carries very slightly more – 520 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW 3 Series Touring is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
3 Series Touring

BMW 3 Series Touring

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 530 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 91 - 97 km
BMW 3 Series Touring
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW 3 Series Touring

The BMW 3 Series Touring blends sporting poise with everyday practicality, wrapping sharp handling and a premium cabin into a wagon that actually makes errands feel enjoyable. It’s the kind of car that hides a family-hauler’s sense of duty beneath a driver's-car attitude — useful, classy, and just cheeky enough to make you smile on the open road.

details

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
BMW 3 Series Touring
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 91,900 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
91 - 97 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
57 - 233 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,650 - 2,025 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
410 - 500 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,827 - 1,903 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 520 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 530 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 700 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
110 - 390 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.