VS

BMW 3 Series Touring vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (530 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 3 Series Touring or Skoda Enyaq?

BMW 3 Series Touring vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

BMW 3 Series Touring

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Series Touring

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq is slightly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the BMW 3 Series Touring costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,209 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 492 km more than the BMW 3 Series Touring.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 3 Series Touring offers noticeably more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 3 Series Touring is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 3 Series Touring delivers only slightly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 21 Nm more.

3 Series Touring

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BMW 3 Series Touring is noticeably lighter – 1,650 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 424 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more boot space – 585 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 85 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries marginally more – 526 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW 3 Series Touring

The BMW 3 Series Touring blends sporting poise with everyday practicality, wrapping sharp handling and a premium cabin into a wagon that actually makes errands feel enjoyable. It’s the kind of car that hides a family-hauler’s sense of duty beneath a driver's-car attitude — useful, classy, and just cheeky enough to make you smile on the open road.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 91,900 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 10.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
91 - 97 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
57 - 233 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,650 - 2,025 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
410 - 500 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,827 - 1,903 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 520 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 530 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 700 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 390 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.