Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW i4 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (601 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (49,400 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW i4 or Skoda Enyaq?
BMW i4 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
i4
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Enyaq is slightly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the BMW i4 costs 49,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,457 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BMW i4 is barely more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW i4 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 613 km, about 26 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW i4 offers considerably more power – delivering 601 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 261 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW i4 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW i4 delivers somewhat more torque with 795 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 116 Nm more.
i4
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW i4 is marginally lighter – 2,070 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries very slightly more – 489 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW i4 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,400
BMW i4
BMW i4
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW i4
The BMW i4 arrives with the poise of a classic Gran Coupé, marrying BMW's playful handling with a sleek, modern interior that makes switching to electric feel like an upgrade rather than a compromise. For buyers who want a practical daily driver that still enjoys a spirited back-road run, the i4 quietly delivers smiles and a surprising dose of driver engagement.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
BMW i4
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,400 - 62,500 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
514 - 613 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,285 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
445 - 480 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 601 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
400 - 795 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
210 - 442 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.