VS

BMW XM vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (748 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (116,100 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Ford Puma?

BMW XM vs Ford Puma: Key differences

BMW XM

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XM

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the BMW XM costs 116,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 92,228 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW XM uses 4.7 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 337 km more than the BMW XM.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM offers considerably more power – delivering 748 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 580 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW XM delivers clearly more torque with 1,000 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 710 Nm more.

XM

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: BMW XM offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 1,379 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW XM offers barely more boot space – 527 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW XM carries a bit more – 525 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
BMW XM
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW XM

The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.

details

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
BMW XM
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption

Price
116,100 - 159,300 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
78 - 80 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 119 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,695 - 2,795 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
527 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,005 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 525 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
700 - 1,000 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
2,998 - 4,395 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.