VS

BMW XM vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (748 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (116100 £ vs 49300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Mazda CX-80?

BMW XM vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

BMW XM

  • convincingly more power
  • distinct more electric range
  • significantly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • decisively more trunk space

Mazda CX-80

  • decisively cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • evident lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XM

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £ , while the BMW XM costs 116100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 66814 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 4 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the BMW XM with 4.70 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the BMW XM performs distinct better – achieving up to 80 km, about 20 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM has a convincingly edge – offering 748 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 421 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW XM pulls significantly stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm difference.

XM

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is evident lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 564 kg.

In terms of boot space, the BMW XM offers decisively more room – 527 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 269 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 to a small extent takes the win – 650 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW XM is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
BMW XM
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £116,100
XM

BMW XM

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 476 - 748 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 5.3 L
  • Electric Range : 78 - 80 km
details

BMW XM

The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.

details
P90478657_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478646_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478549_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478580_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews BMW XM

Reviews Mazda CX-80

BMW XM
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
116100 - 159300 £
Price
49300 - 61400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.3 L
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 - 80 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 119 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2695 - 2795 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
527 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2005 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 525 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
700 - 1000 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
2998 - 4395 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
BMW X5
BMW XM
VS
The BMW X5, known for its versatility and luxurious comfort, appeals to those seeking a balanced blend of performance and practicality. In contrast, the BMW XM stands out with its distinctive styling and hybrid powertrain, offering a more avant-garde experience aimed at drivers who prioritize …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and Toyota RAV4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?

The BMW XM is available as All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.