Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Citroen C4 vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (156 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C4 or Ford Puma?
Citroen C4 vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
C4
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C4 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,223 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C4 uses 4.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen C4. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C4 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 427 km, about 10 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen C4 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers barely more torque with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
C4
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,403 kg. The difference is around 87 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 13 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries a bit more – 469 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Citroen C4
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen C4
Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Citroen C4
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,700 - 32,200 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,652 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.