@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
VS

Citroen C4 vs Ford Puma – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Citroen C4 meets Ford Puma.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C4 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Citroen C4 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4209 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen C4 manages with 4.70 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Citroen C4 with 14.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.

As for range, the Citroen C4 performs a bit better – achieving up to 427 km, about 51 km more than the Ford Puma.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a minimal edge – offering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Citroen C4 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 210 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls barely noticeable stronger with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.

C4 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is minimal lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1403 kg. The difference is around 87 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slight more room – 523 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 13 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Citroen C4 performs minimal better – up to 1360 L, which is about 77 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slightly takes the win – 469 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Citroen C4 proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Citroen C4 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £20,600
C4 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Citroen C4

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 4.8 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.5 - 15.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 354 - 427 km
details

Citroen C4

5 (1)
rate

Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.

details
C4_2021_EXT (7) @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
C4_2021_EXT (13) @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
C4_2021_EXT (11) @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
CL 20 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
C4_INT_2021 (8) @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Citroen C4
Ford Puma
C4 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Consumption
Price
20600 - 32000 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.3 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
0 - 108 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 50 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1403 - 1659 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4350 - 4580 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1800 - 1834 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1520 - 1525 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Max trunk capacity
1250 - 1360 L
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Payload
381 - 406 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
150 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C4
@ DS Automobiles / Stellantis Media
DS Automobiles DS 4
VS
Citroen C4 and DS Automobiles DS 4 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C4
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
VS
The Citroen C4 and the MG ZS both offer distinct appeals for compact SUV enthusiasts, each targeting a unique clientele with their design and features. The Citroen C4 stands out with its avant-garde styling and innovative interior technology, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and …
What drivetrain options does the Citroen C4 have?

The Citroen C4 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.