VS

Citroen C5 Aircross vs Ford Puma – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Citroen C5 Aircross meets Ford Puma.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C5 Aircross @ media.stellantis.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Citroen C5 Aircross costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4363 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen C5 Aircross manages with 2.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 2.90 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Citroen C5 Aircross with 17 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.90 kWh.

As for range, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 520 km, about 144 km more than the Ford Puma.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Citroen C5 Aircross has a somewhat edge – offering 210 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Citroen C5 Aircross takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs minimal better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Citroen C5 Aircross pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

C5 Aircross @ media.stellantis.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is evident lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 313 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers minimal more room – 565 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1668 L, which is about 385 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Citroen C5 Aircross minimal takes the win – 471 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 2 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Citroen C5 Aircross proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Citroen C5 Aircross is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £29,100
a9203463-62b0a96fb4625

Citroen C5 Aircross

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 210 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.5 - 5.4 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 kWh
  • Electric Range : 81 - 520 km
details

Citroen C5 Aircross

The Citroen C5 Aircross stands out in the SUV market with its distinctively bold design and emphasis on comfort. Its interior is thoughtfully crafted, providing spaciousness and a plethora of features that cater to passenger convenience and enjoyment. With its smooth ride and refined driving dynamics, it offers a relaxing experience for both city commutes and long-distance journeys.

details
a9203463-62b0a96fb4625 @ media.stellantis.com
a9203203-62b0a97459d8e @ media.stellantis.com
a9201305-62b0a98f68101 @ media.stellantis.com
citroenc5aircrosshybrid225069-62b0a8a3075bb @ media.stellantis.com

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Puma
C5 Aircross
Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 41600 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range
81 - 520 km
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
17.8 - 73 kWh
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
0 - 121 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1629 - 2184 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
565 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4650 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1870 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1695 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Max trunk capacity
1668 L
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Payload
446 - 471 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 210 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
170 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Citroen C5 Aircross
Vauxhall Grandland
VS
When comparing the Citroen C5 Aircross to the Vauxhall Grandland, both SUVs offer distinct advantages in terms of comfort and practicality. The Citroen C5 Aircross stands out with its unique suspension system and plush seating, providing a highly comfortable ride that is well-suited for long journeys. Meanwhile, the Vauxhall Grandland appeals with its sporty design and efficient engines, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a dynamic driving experience without compromising on space.
Ford Puma
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing between these two vehicles may come down to personal preference, as both offer unique strengths tailored to different driving tastes.
What drive types are available for the Citroen C5 Aircross?

The Citroen C5 Aircross is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.