Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Citroen C5 Aircross vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (225 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C5 Aircross or Ford Puma?
Citroen C5 Aircross vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
C5 Aircross
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Citroen C5 Aircross costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,220 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C5 Aircross uses 2.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is visibly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Citroen C5 Aircross. That’s a difference of about 4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers moderately more range – reaching up to 520 km, about 103 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers markedly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen C5 Aircross takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C5 Aircross delivers marginally more torque with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
C5 Aircross
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 313 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers only slightly more boot space – 565 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the Citroen C5 Aircross carries very slightly more – 471 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 2 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Citroen C5 Aircross is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £29,100
Citroen C5 Aircross
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen C5 Aircross
The Citroën C5 Aircross feels like a sofa on wheels, delivering a calm, floaty ride and clever packaging that makes life with luggage and kids noticeably easier. Quirky French styling and a supremely practical, family-focused cabin mean it quietly wins hearts by prioritising comfort over showroom bravado.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 43,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 5.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
81 - 520 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 2,184 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
565 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
446 - 471 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.