Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (180 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Ford Puma?
Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Jumpy Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter costs 32,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,216 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is considerably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 10.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 89 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers barely more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Jumpy Transporter delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,722 kg. The difference is around 406 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries substantially more – 1,226 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 757 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 199 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.