In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and dynamic performance, appealing to driving enthusiasts. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq offers practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families and those seeking comfort. While the Terramar delivers a thrilling ride, the Karoq excels in functionality, ultimately catering to different driver priorities.
In the competitive automotive landscape, the struggle between sporty performance and practicality often leads consumers to make tough choices. This time, we delve into a battle between two prominent SUVs: the CUPRA Terramar and the Skoda Karoq. Both vehicles offer unique blends of technology, performance, and comfort, but which one stands out in the 2024 model year? Let's break it down.
The CUPRA Terramar is available with an impressive lineup of engines, including options for Plug-In Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, and traditional petrol engines. The power figures range from 150 HP to a hefty 272 HP, ensuring it can cater to various driving styles. The Terramar excels in acceleration, with the fastest variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 5.3 seconds. Furthermore, its torque capably supports powerful driving, with up to 400 Nm on offer.
On the other hand, the Skoda Karoq, while slightly less sporty, provides a versatile range of engine options. With power outputs from 115 to a commendable 190 HP, it focuses more on fuel efficiency than outright speed. The quickest Karoq do the 0-100 km/h sprint in 7 seconds but generally sits between 8.7 to 10.6 seconds depending on the configuration. Its torque peaks at 360 Nm, indicating sufficient power for daily driving needs.
With increasing focus on sustainability, the CUPRA Terramar shines with its Plug-In Hybrid variant, offering a fuel consumption rate as low as 0.4 L/100km and an electric range of 120 km, making it an attractive option for eco-conscious drivers. The CO2 emissions also reflect its efficiency, with some models emitting a mere 10 g/km.
The Skoda Karoq, although not hybrid, offers commendable fuel consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 6.1 L/100km, depending on the engine choice. CO2 emissions for the Karoq are slightly higher, ranging from 129 to 174 g/km, ultimately labeling it less efficient in comparison to the Terramar. Yet for a traditional combustion engine vehicle, it presents a competitive offering.
When it comes to interior space, both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers, yet they differentiate in their overall design philosophy. The CUPRA Terramar features a sporty and modern layout filled with high-quality materials that amplify its performance-oriented character. With a trunk capacity of 450 liters, it provides adequate space for day-to-day use.
The Skoda Karoq, however, scores higher in practicality with its larger trunk capacity of 521 liters, offering more room for luggage or grocery runs. Inside, it boasts a user-friendly infotainment system, standard in modern Skoda vehicles, ensuring drivers can remain connected without distraction.
The driving dynamics of the CUPRA Terramar cater to enthusiasts, with options for both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive configurations. Its adaptive suspension system offers the perfect balance between comfort and sportiness, making it a joy to drive on winding roads.
In contrast, the Skoda Karoq prioritizes comfort and stability over outright performance. Its setup is made to provide a smooth ride, making it ideal for family trips or city commuting. While it occasionally lacks the punch of the Terramar, its handling remains engaging and secure.
Choosing between the CUPRA Terramar and Skoda Karoq ultimately depends on your driving needs and preferences. If you're after a sporty, high-performance SUV with cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly options, the CUPRA Terramar is hard to beat. However, if you prioritize practicality, comfort, and cost-efficiency for family use, the Skoda Karoq remains a stellar choice.
As we move forward, the automotive market continues to evolve, and it's exciting to see how these two models will shape the landscape in the coming years.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 36900 - 51400
£
|
Price
about 28400 - 41000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
120
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
10 - 192
g/km
|
co2
129 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1638 - 1904
kg
|
Curb weight
1364 - 1608
kg
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540
L
|
Trunk capacity
521
L
|
Length
4519
mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390
mm
|
Width
1869
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1586
mm
|
Height
1603 - 1624
mm
|
Payload
512 - 542
kg
|
Payload
426 - 573
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 272
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 9.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6
s
|
Max Speed
205 - 243
km/h
|
Max Speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
110 - 200
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
205 - 243
km/h
|
Top speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, G, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.