VS

Dacia Sandero vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (11,000 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Sandero or Toyota C-HR+?

Dacia Sandero vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Dacia Sandero

3.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter

Toyota C-HR+

  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Sandero

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Dacia Sandero is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,000 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,029 £.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers clearly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 221 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Dacia Sandero takes 9.7 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers considerably more torque with 338 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm more.

Sandero

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Sandero is significantly lighter – 1,100 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 710 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR+ offers moderately more boot space – 416 L compared to 372 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries noticeably more – 655 kg compared to 436 kg. That’s a difference of about 219 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Dacia Sandero
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Dacia Sandero

The Dacia Sandero is the everyman's hatchback — unpretentious, practical and brilliantly affordable, with sensible space and straightforward charm where it matters most. It won't wow in the premium lane, but for buyers who want honest, dependable transport without showroom theatrics, the Sandero is a clever, no‑nonsense pick that keeps running costs low and grin levels high.

details
d220195p
d220191p
d220190p

Reviews Dacia Sandero

3.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Вітали
8 Apr 2026, 08:19:06

Сандеро з 12 року

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Le
9 Mar 2026, 11:19:49

Hello — having tried the Sandero Stepway Extreme Auto 120.
The big downside is at the front, where large consoles on both the passenger and driver doors create a feeling that, as the kilometres go by, you have to drive with your knees squeezed together. On top of that, the small compartment between the two seats is more cumbersome than practical.
The rear seats are really spacious.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In one corner: the Tesla Model Y — the electric SUV that turned long-range EVs and futuristic tech into everyday normal, complete with ludicrously quick acceleration and a touchscreen for everything. In the other: the Toyota C-HR+ — a sharply styled, clever little crossover that prefers fuel …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Mégane
VS
It’s the classic value-versus-style standoff: the Dacia Sandero arrives like a sensible bargain you can live with every day, while the Renault Mégane promises sharper looks and a dose of refinement — for a healthier cheque. We’ll drive, measure and compare practicality, economy and driving feel to …
Kia EV4 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The electric Kia EV4 Hatchback — slick, tech-packed and built for range-minded commutes — goes head-to-head with the quirky, style-first Toyota C‑HR+, a compact crossover that favours personality and frugal running costs. By the end of this DriveDuel showdown we’ll tell you which one deserves your …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR+
VS
When the Lexus LBX squares off against the Toyota C-HR+, you're looking at badge-driven luxury versus clever value in the same compact package. We'll sort out which car looks better in the driveway, feels sharper behind the wheel, and — crucially — makes more sense for your money (spoiler: it's not …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
The Dacia Sandero is the no-nonsense value king—spacious, economical and brutally practical for buyers who want transport, not trinkets. The Renault Captur, by contrast, bundles sharper styling, more tech and a cosier cabin into a compact SUV package, so you pay extra for polish and personality.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Unsure whether the Toyota C-HR or the Toyota C-HR+ is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Dacia Sandero
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,000 - 16,300 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 7.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
111 - 131 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,100 - 1,297 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
372 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,853 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 - 436 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, LPG
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
67 - 122 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 - 16.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
95 - 200 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
49 - 90 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Dacia
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Dacia Sandero have?

The Dacia Sandero is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.