Compare performance (118 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (19,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat 500 Convertible or Ford Puma?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Fiat 500 Convertible is visibly cheaper – starting at 19,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,209 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat 500 Convertible uses 5.2 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 13 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 104 km more than the Fiat 500 Convertible.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 118 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Fiat 500 Convertible takes 9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers markedly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 220 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Fiat 500 Convertible is moderately lighter – 1,150 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more boot space – 523 L compared to 183 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries markedly more – 469 kg compared to 325 kg. That’s a difference of about 144 kg.
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Fiat 500 Convertible is a cheeky, retro-styled roof-down city car that turns heads and makes short trips feel like mini vacations. It’s more about charm and personality than practicality, ideal for style-conscious buyers who prefer fun and flair over brute practicality.
details
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
19,700 - 28,300 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 14.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
190 - 313 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 123 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Convertible
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,150 - 1,480 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
183 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,683 - 1,684 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
250 - 325 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
65 - 118 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 17.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
92 - 220 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
48 - 87 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
Ford
|