VS

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (95 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (16,800 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van or VW T-Roc?

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

  • substantially cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
details

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fiorino Qubo Van

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is substantially cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,659 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van uses 5.1 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc offers markedly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van takes 11.9 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers somewhat more torque with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: VW T-Roc offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is somewhat lighter – 1,285 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van carries very slightly more – 535 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW T-Roc holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £26,400
T-Roc

VW T-Roc

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

The Fiat Qubo van is a compact urban workhorse that hides an impressively practical load area behind deceptively small proportions, making tight city streets and parking a breeze. It’s not flashy, but its sensible layout, easy-to-live-with character and wallet-friendly running make it a solid pick for anyone needing dependable everyday practicality without fuss.

details
serpimg_a22BOG

Reviews Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
CUPRA Formentor
VW T-Roc
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that balance everyday practicality with distinct personalities—one leaning sporty and style‑focused, the other aiming for broad appeal and comfort. This quick comparison highlights how the Formentor’s sharper driving character and design …
Audi A3 Sportback
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the VW T‑Roc share many Volkswagen Group underpinnings but target different buyers: the A3 Sportback focuses on refined driving dynamics and premium cabin quality, while the VW T‑Roc offers a taller, more practical crossover package at a more value-driven price. This …
Audi Q2
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q2 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions with a touch of style and practicality. This comparison focuses on driving feel, interior space, technology and ownership costs to help you decide which suits your priorities.
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
16,800 - 17,100 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
133 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
3
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,285 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
3,957 mm
Length
-
Width
1,716 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
1,721 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,500 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
535 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 95 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
162 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
59 - 70 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,248 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2016
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Fiat
Brand
VW
Is the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van offered with different drivetrains?

The Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.