VS

Fiat Tipo Hatchback vs Ford Puma – Which model is better for everyday use?

Two cars, one duel: Fiat Tipo Hatchback meets Ford Puma.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tipo Hatchback @ media.stellantis.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Fiat Tipo Hatchback has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19700 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Fiat Tipo Hatchback manages with 4.70 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a distinct edge – offering 168 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Fiat Tipo Hatchback takes 8.80 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Fiat Tipo Hatchback tops out at 208 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Fiat Tipo Hatchback pulls slight stronger with 320 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

Tipo Hatchback @ media.stellantis.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is hardly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1415 kg. The difference is around 99 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more room – 523 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Fiat Tipo Hatchback shows itself to be has the upper hand and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £19,700
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_08

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 5.4 L
details

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

The Fiat Tipo Hatchback offers a practical and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families and those who value comfort on long journeys. Its sleek design and modern features provide a stylish look without compromising on functionality. The driving experience is smooth and reliable, delivering a sense of confidence whether navigating urban streets or exploring the countryside.

details
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_08 @ media.stellantis.com
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_09 @ media.stellantis.com
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_10 @ media.stellantis.com
13_Tipo Cross @ media.stellantis.com

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Fiat Tipo Hatchback
Ford Puma
Tipo Hatchback
Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
19700 - 25700 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1415 - 1425 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4368 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1792 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1495 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Payload
425 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
207 - 208 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1469 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior offers a stylish blend of Italian design and spirited performance, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Ford Puma impresses with its practicality and advanced technology features, making it a versatile choice for everyday use. While the Junior captivates with its heritage and sportiness, the Puma excels in comfort and reliability, catering to different segments of the market.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Ford Puma impresses with its dynamic design and agile handling, making it an attractive option for city dwellers seeking both style and practicality. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 208, known for its elegant interior and efficient engine options, offers a compelling blend of technology and comfort that appeals to urban drivers. Ultimately, choosing between the Puma and the 208 comes down to prioritizing either the sporty performance of the Ford or the sophisticated refinement of the Peugeot.
What drive types are available for the Fiat Tipo Hatchback?

The Fiat Tipo Hatchback is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.