VS

Fiat Tipo Hatchback vs Mazda CX-30 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Fiat Tipo Hatchback or Mazda CX-30 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Fiat Tipo Hatchback has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19700 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5529 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Fiat Tipo Hatchback manages with 4.70 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 186 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Fiat Tipo Hatchback takes 8.80 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Fiat Tipo Hatchback performs slight better – reaching 208 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Fiat Tipo Hatchback pulls noticeable stronger with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Fiat Tipo Hatchback is slight lighter – 1415 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Fiat Tipo Hatchback offers slight more room – 440 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 somewhat takes the win – 496 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be edges ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

The Fiat Tipo Hatchback offers a practical and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families and those who value comfort on long journeys. Its sleek design and modern features provide a stylish look without compromising on functionality. The driving experience is smooth and reliable, delivering a sense of confidence whether navigating urban streets or exploring the countryside.

details
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_08 @ media.stellantis.com
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_09 @ media.stellantis.com
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_Hatchback_10 @ media.stellantis.com
13_Tipo Cross @ media.stellantis.com

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq, buyers are treated to two distinct takes on the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and space efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both offer a compelling blend of style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Fiat Tipo Hatchback
Mazda CX-30
Tipo Hatchback
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
19700 - 25700 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1415 - 1425 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4368 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1792 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1495 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
425 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
207 - 208 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1469 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 showcases its premium interior and striking design, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and comfort. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Vitara stands out with its rugged versatility and off-road capabilities, making it a great choice for adventurous drivers. Ultimately, while both SUVs offer unique strengths, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style versus practicality.
Mazda CX-30
Mazda MX-30
VS
In the rapidly evolving world of crossover SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda MX-30 represent distinct approaches to modern driving needs, each with its unique charm. The CX-30 captivates with its robust yet refined design supported by a traditional internal combustion engine, focusing on practicality and spirited performance. On the other hand, the MX-30, Mazda's first all-electric offering, caters to eco-conscious drivers with its stylish, unconventional design and commendable focus on sustainability, making it an intriguing option for those ready to embrace the electric vehicle market.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
What drive types are available for the Fiat Tipo Hatchback?

The Fiat Tipo Hatchback is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.