Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Bronco or Mazda CX-80 fits your lifestyle better.
Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-80 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Ford Bronco costs 58200 £. That’s a price difference of around 10028 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.30 L. The difference is about 9.70 L per 100 km.
Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco has a barely noticeable edge – offering 335 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.70 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Ford Bronco tops out at 161 km/h. The difference is around 58 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Bronco pulls barely noticeable stronger with 563 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is minimal lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2289 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Bronco offers clearly more room – 562 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 304 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs minimal better – up to 1971 L, which is about 167 L more than the Ford Bronco.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 noticeable takes the win – 650 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 239 kg.
The Mazda CX-80 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Bronco has made a striking comeback, capturing the spirit of adventure that made it a legend in the off-road community. With its rugged design and versatile features, this SUV invites enthusiasts to explore the great outdoors like never before. Whether navigating challenging terrain or cruising city streets, the Bronco effortlessly blends classic charm with modern capabilities, making it a must-have for any driving enthusiast.
detailsThe Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
58200 - 60000 £
|
Price
48200 - 60200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
61 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
257 - 288 g/km
|
co2
35 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
79 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2289 - 2418 kg
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
4800 - 4811 mm
|
Length
4995 mm
|
|
Width
1928 - 1937 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1938 - 1962 mm
|
Height
1714 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1780 - 1804 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
|
|
Payload
387 - 411 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
335 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
161 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
563 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
246 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2694 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The Ford Bronco is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.