VS

Ford Puma vs Aston Martin Vantage comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 168,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Aston Martin Vantage?

Ford Puma vs Aston Martin Vantage: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Aston Martin Vantage

  • substantially more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Aston Martin Vantage costs 168,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 144,086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Aston Martin Vantage with 12.1 L/100km. The difference is about 6.7 L/100km.

Vantage

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Aston Martin Vantage offers substantially more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 512 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Aston Martin Vantage is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Aston Martin Vantage delivers significantly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 510 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,745 kg. The difference is around 429 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 288 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Aston Martin Vantage

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Aston Martin Vantage

The Aston Martin Vantage marries sculptural, jaw-dropping design with a ferociously engaging character that turns everyday drives into a headline act. Buyers get a luxuriously intimate cabin and a raw, communicative chassis — perfect if you crave theatre every time you pull away.

details
serpimg_QK5xIx

Reviews Aston Martin Vantage

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
VS
The Ford Puma and the VW T‑Roc are two top choices in the compact crossover segment, but they deliver different strengths — the Puma leans sporty and driver-focused while the T‑Roc prioritises space and refinement. This quick comparison will highlight how their performance, practicality and tech …
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
The Ford Focus stays the sensible, sharply handling hatchback — roomier and more practical for long miles and family duty — while the Ford Puma trades rear-seat space for a taller stance, cheeky crossover looks and a clever MegaBox for weekend kit. Choose the Focus if you want involvement and …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
VW Taigo
VS
The Ford Puma and Volkswagen Taigo are compact crossover SUVs that bring raised ride height and SUV styling to the city-friendly hatchback segment. This comparison looks at driving feel, practicality, efficiency and equipment to help you decide which one better matches your priorities.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Ford Puma and Škoda Kamiq are two compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want car-like driving with a taller ride and practical interiors. This comparison looks at how they differ in driving feel, space, running costs and everyday usability so you can pick the one that suits your life. Driving …
Ford Puma
Aston Martin Vantage

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
168,000 - 228,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
12.1 - 12.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
274 - 279 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe, Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,745 - 1,805 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
235 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,980 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
665 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 3.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
489 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
3,982 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Aston Martin
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.