Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro?
Ford Puma vs GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro is slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,494 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
HAVAL Jolion Pro
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro offers only slightly more power – delivering 177 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers barely more torque with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,595 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more boot space – 523 L compared to 381 L. That’s a difference of about 142 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries visibly more – 469 kg compared to 330 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro
The Haval Jolion Pro punches above its class with sharp styling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and a feature set that feels more premium than its price suggests. It’s an easy-to-live-with compact SUV that aims to charm value-conscious buyers who want style and tech without the badge drama — and it might just make your neighbours ask if you traded up.
details
Ford Puma
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
21,400 - 23,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
167 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,595 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
381 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,898 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
330 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
177 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
130 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
GWM
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.