Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs GWM ORA 03 - Differences and prices compared
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33400 £. That’s a price difference of around 8649 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the GWM ORA 03 with 16.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.40 kWh.
As for range, the GWM ORA 03 performs a bit better – achieving up to 420 km, about 44 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 03 has a minimal edge – offering 171 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.20 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – reaching 210 km/h, while the GWM ORA 03 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Ford Puma is evident lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1615 kg. The difference is around 299 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers convincingly more room – 523 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 295 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs noticeable better – up to 1283 L, which is about 425 L more than the GWM ORA 03.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
GWM ORA 03
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
1.7 (6 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
GWM ORA 03
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
details
Ford Puma
GWM ORA 03
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
33400 - 42400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
45.4 - 59.3 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1615 - 1655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4235 - 4254 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1825 - 1848 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1603 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
858 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
GWM
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.