Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs GWM ORA 07 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 408 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or GWM ORA 07?
Ford Puma vs GWM ORA 07: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the GWM ORA 07 costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,077 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the GWM ORA 07. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 07 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 520 km, about 103 km more than the Ford Puma.
ORA 07
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 07 offers considerably more power – delivering 408 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 240 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM ORA 07 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 07 delivers clearly more torque with 680 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 390 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 749 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers markedly more boot space – 523 L compared to 333 L. That’s a difference of about 190 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The GWM ORA 07 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,000
GWM ORA 07
Ford Puma
GWM ORA 07
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
GWM ORA 07
The GWM ORA 07 arrives as a cheeky, fashion-forward electric crossover that blends retro-modern styling with practical everyday sense, so it’s as happy in city traffic as it is turning heads on the boulevard. Inside you get a comfy, tech-rich cabin and sensible packaging without a premium sticker, making it a smart pick for buyers who want personality and value in one neat package.
details
Ford Puma
GWM ORA 07
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
36,000 - 45,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
440 - 520 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,210 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
333 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
350 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 408 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
340 - 680 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 300 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
GWM
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.