Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Honda Prelude comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 42,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Honda Prelude?
Ford Puma vs Honda Prelude: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Honda Prelude costs 42,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,514 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda Prelude uses 5.2 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Prelude
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda Prelude offers barely more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda Prelude takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda Prelude delivers barely more torque with 315 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,545 kg. The difference is around 229 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers considerably more boot space – 523 L compared to 264 L. That’s a difference of about 259 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 305 kg. That’s a difference of about 164 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Honda Prelude
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Honda Prelude
The Honda Prelude is the coupe that proves Honda can blend precision with a hint of romance, serving up crisp steering and a chassis that loves a flowing road. It’s practical enough for the commute and stylish enough to make parking-lot goodbyes last longer, with reliability that keeps your wallet calm and your right foot curious.
details
Ford Puma
Honda Prelude
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
42,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
117 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,545 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
264 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,880 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
305 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
315 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.