VS

Ford Puma vs Honda ZR-V comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Honda ZR-V?

Ford Puma vs Honda ZR-V: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
details

Honda ZR-V

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Honda ZR-V costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Honda ZR-V with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

ZR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda ZR-V offers marginally more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda ZR-V takes 7.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda ZR-V delivers marginally more torque with 315 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,660 kg. The difference is around 344 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Honda HR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
Choosing between the Honda HR-V and the Honda ZR-V comes down to whether you prefer a nimble subcompact crossover (HR-V) or a slightly larger, more spacious compact SUV (ZR-V) — both deliver Honda’s practicality and efficiency. This quick comparison will focus on the key differences in size, …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Honda ZR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Honda ZR-V

The Honda ZR-V blends smart practicality with sharper styling than you might expect, giving buyers a calm, competent companion for daily life. Inside it's comfortable and cleverly laid out, easy to live with and never trying too hard to be exciting.

details
440009_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
440010_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
440007_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
440004_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
440008_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439994_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439993_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439991_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439989_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439988_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439986_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439984_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439981_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439980_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439978_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439979_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance
439971_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance

Reviews Honda ZR-V

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Frans
18 May 2026, 09:50:16

Lovely driving feel, quiet, fast, solid and reliable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Denes Molnar
17 May 2026, 19:58:46

Enjoy to drive, long driving range, good fluel consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Pan
5 Oct 2025, 11:26:07

HONDA ZRV — snappy, fast, perfect in every way, whisper-quiet, maximum comfort, extraordinary quality and price. For me: 5 stars.

Frequently compared as well

Honda ZR-V
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Honda ZR‑V brings sharper handling and a more premium-feeling cabin, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a bit of sparkle for everyday practicality, fuel-sipping reliability and stronger resale prospects. If you want a compact SUV that’s slightly more fun to drive and feels a touch upmarket, …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Honda Civic
Honda ZR-V
VS
Want sharp handling, a lower centre of gravity and a bit of joie de vivre behind the wheel? The Civic is your pick; the ZR‑V swaps that sporty edge for raised seating, SUV practicality and more boot space — choose the Civic for driving thrills, the ZR‑V for family-friendly versatility.
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Nissan Qashqai comes down to whether you value a punchy, city-friendly crossover with sharp handling and clever storage or a more spacious, comfort-focused compact SUV for longer journeys. The Puma excels at engaging driving dynamics and smart packaging, while …
Ford Puma
Honda ZR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
35,100 - 38,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
130 - 132 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,660 - 1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
440 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
315 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Honda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.