Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 59,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Hyundai IONIQ 9?
Ford Puma vs Hyundai IONIQ 9: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Hyundai IONIQ 9 costs 59,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35,957 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is considerably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 19.9 kWh/100km for the Hyundai IONIQ 9. That’s a difference of about 6.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 203 km more than the Ford Puma.
IONIQ 9
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 offers clearly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 260 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai IONIQ 9 delivers clearly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Hyundai IONIQ 9 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,594 kg. The difference is around 1,278 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers markedly more boot space – 523 L compared to 338 L. That’s a difference of about 185 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 carries clearly more – 643 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 174 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Hyundai IONIQ 9
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Hyundai IONIQ 9
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is a bold step forward in the automotive world, combining cutting-edge electric technology with a sleek and modern design. This model stands out with its spacious interior and advanced features, ensuring both comfort and convenience for drivers and passengers alike. As Hyundai pushes the envelope in eco-friendly innovation, the IONIQ 9 represents the future of sustainable driving with its impressive range and performance capabilities.
details
Ford Puma
Hyundai IONIQ 9
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
59,900 - 75,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.9 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
600 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,594 - 2,689 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
338 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,980 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
586 - 643 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
218 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 9.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 700 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
160 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.