Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Jaguar E-Pace comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 32400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jaguar E-Pace?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Jaguar E-Pace costs 32400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7629 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar E-Pace manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 417 km, about 348 km more than the Jaguar E-Pace.
E-Pace
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar E-Pace has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 269 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar E-Pace is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jaguar E-Pace performs barely noticeable better – reaching 211 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar E-Pace pulls clearly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1783 kg. The difference is around 467 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jaguar E-Pace offers barely noticeable more room – 494 L compared to 456 L. That’s a difference of about 38 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1216 L, which is about 46 L more than the Jaguar E-Pace.
When it comes to payload, Jaguar E-Pace a bit takes the win – 554 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar E-Pace is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Jaguar E-Pace
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £32,400
Jaguar E-Pace
Ford Puma
2.9 (10 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Jaguar E-Pace
The Jaguar E-Pace brings compact SUV practicality together with taut, sporty design and unmistakable British charm, helping it stand out in a crowded class. Inside, the cabin feels premium and the driving manners are engaging enough to keep a grin on your face, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want Jaguar style without the bulk.
details
Ford Puma
Jaguar E-Pace
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
32400 - 56100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
33 - 185 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1783 - 2173 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 L
|
Trunk capacity
494 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4395 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1984 mm
|
|
Height
1550 mm
|
Height
1648 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1170 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
497 - 554 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.