Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Jaguar E-Pace – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jaguar E-Pace?
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Jaguar E-Pace costs 32400 £. That’s a price difference of around 7629 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar E-Pace manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 307 km more than the Jaguar E-Pace.
E-Pace
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar E-Pace has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 269 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar E-Pace is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jaguar E-Pace performs barely noticeable better – reaching 211 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar E-Pace pulls clearly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1783 kg. The difference is around 467 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 494 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – up to 1283 L, which is about 113 L more than the Jaguar E-Pace.
When it comes to payload, Jaguar E-Pace a bit takes the win – 554 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Jaguar E-Pace proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Jaguar E-Pace is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £32,400
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Jaguar E-Pace
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Jaguar E-Pace
The Jaguar E-Pace is a compact SUV that combines the brand's signature luxury with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek design features graceful lines and an assertive stance, making it a standout on any road. Inside, the E-Pace boasts a meticulously crafted interior with high-quality materials and advanced technology, providing both comfort and connectivity for drivers and passengers alike.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Ford Puma
Jaguar E-Pace
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
32400 - 56100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
33 - 185 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1783 - 2173 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
494 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4395 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1984 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1648 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1170 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
497 - 554 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.