Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Jeep Grand Cherokee comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 85,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Jeep Grand Cherokee?
Ford Puma vs Jeep Grand Cherokee: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Jeep Grand Cherokee costs 85,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 61,714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses 2.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 372 km more than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Grand Cherokee
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers considerably more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 212 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Grand Cherokee is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Grand Cherokee delivers clearly more torque with 637 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 347 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 1,118 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Grand Cherokee carries markedly more – 641 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 172 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Jeep Grand Cherokee
The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.
details
Ford Puma
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
85,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
45 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
65 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,434 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,968 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
641 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
380 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
637 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
280 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.